03:0003:00, 21 November 2019diffhist−2
Golliwog
Undo revision 909561853 of 6 August: The para does not imply they were exclusive to boys, only that few types of dolls were ("....were generally male. For this reason...") To change "boy" to "child" makes this nonsense
20:1920:19, 20 November 2019diffhist−68
Missing person
→Reasons: remove ugly "by a parent(s)/guardian(s)/sibling(s)/spouse" qualifying "domestic abuse"- while this could be rewritten as "by parents, guardians, siblings or a spouse" it is not necessary to give an incomplete list of potential abusers