06:2706:27, 26 July 2023diffhist+1,052
Socialist Alternative (Australia)
Undid revision 1167181782 by AlanS (talk) WP:RS does not require sources to be unbiased or objective when discussing the disputed views of opposing groups. I have edited the wording to reflect this, even though it's fairly common knowledge that pro-Israel groups accuse supporters of Palestine of anti-Semitism regularly. I will work under the assumption that AlanS is operating in good faith, but his edits remove one entire side of a debate.
05:0905:09, 26 July 2023diffhist+1,018
Socialist Alternative (Australia)
→Student activism: Restoring a paragraph that was written in a balanced fashion. The replacement failed to represent the sources in a neutral way. Anti-semitism allegations against pro-Palestine groups are by definition NPOV. Don't edit content to be more NPOV just because you think the sources are unreliable. Put in the work to find better sources.Tags: Manual revertReverted