21:2721:27, 26 May 2024diffhist+190
Singular they
→Cognitive efficiency: I found this paragraph (added in April) a stumbling block to parse, and in the process of reviewing the source to see how to word it better, I notice it's being summarized in an odd way... revise...
19:1119:11, 21 May 2024diffhist−123
Cisgender
move §: M's move isn't a =Response= to critiques, but a (embrace of) critique, so move out of =Responses=. temp title it as its own thing, but it'd be better to balance the whole =Critiques= § to reflect where [RS say] most critiques come from (ie rewrite per WEIGHT), w less weight on M (I'll trim one un-WEIGHT-y bit now, cf prev disc. of this whole thing being unweighty - no obj. if s/o rmvs it all pending talk), less on f./i. orgs, & more on how most criticism is from conserv.s
01:1801:18, 20 May 2024diffhist+34
German resistance to Nazism
the lead used to say "engaged in active resistance, including attempts to remove Adolf Hitler from power by assassination or by overthrowing his established regime" (a few years ago), i.e. *attempts* to remove him by overthrowing his regime. as written today, it says "engaged in resistance, including assassination attempts on Adolf Hitler or by overthrowing his regime", as if they resisted *by* overthrowing his regime, successfully. revise to clarify ...
23:0123:01, 9 May 2024diffhist+191
Transsexual
retag some failed-verification info; the tags were removed in good-faith by licks-rocks a while back apparently without noticing the scoping issue: to the extent we're regarding transSEXUAL and transGENDER as such different topics that they have different articles, we need transSEXUAL sources for the transsexual article...
01:2001:20, 17 April 2024diffhist−49
Genspect
consolidate recently added sentence about 'includes clinicians' and existing sentence about 'includes clinicians'
01:1801:18, 17 April 2024diffhist−124
Genspect
I was just going to build on the edit which introduced language about 'supports exploratory care', re-ordering it to lead with the thing they're more noted for (opposing trans care), but actually neither cited source seems to say Genspect 'supports exploratory care' at all, though one quotes them as thinking someone might ban it.
01:1201:12, 17 April 2024diffhist−87
Genspect
rmv this, which was added recently but citing a source which puts “support people with gender dysphoria" in quotation marks, attributing that claim to the group. perhaps this could be rephrased along the lines of "Genspect states that...". also undo change to the shortdesc.
23:2423:24, 15 April 2024diffhist−1,102
Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
now that the news cycle and fervor for day-by-day blow-by-blow has died down, somewhat reduce overdetailed account of Dodgers thing, Wikipedia:TENYEARTEST, see talk. this edit rearranges a few sentences, removes a couple which are puffy or undue reactions-to-reactions-to-reactions-to-things. will move this into the main narrative (it is not due its own section in a 10Y test) in a separate edit, in the interest of keeping the changes/diffs easy to follow.