You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	98
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 192,447 actions, this filter has matched 9 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.09 ms, and it consumes 1.1 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions: (documentation)	article_articleid == 0 & ( new_size < 150 & ( !"confirmed" in user_groups & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( !added_lines irlike "(((?:surname\|given name\|delrev\|softredirect\|db-unpatrolled)))\|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html) ) ) ) ) article_articleid == 0 & ( new_size < 150 & ( !"confirmed" in user_groups & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( !added_lines irlike "(((?:surname\|given name\|delrev\|softredirect\|db-unpatrolled)))\|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html) ) ) ) )
Notes:	Users creating very short articles A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior. Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters... Added ((softredirect)). - Ruslik Added ((db-unpatrolled)), see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego Disabled for sysops. - KoH I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik add tag "very short new article" - Cen I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold Try this instead... - Hersfold There is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P Agree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen Optimizing. -TS Optimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010 optimised 2015 --zzuuzz
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	18:10, 17 February 2015 by Zzuuzz (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"article_articleid == 0 \u0026 \r\n(\r\n new_size \u003C 150 \u0026\r\n (\r\n !\"confirmed\" in user_groups \u0026\r\n (\r\n article_namespace == 0 \u0026 \r\n (\r\n !added_lines irlike \"(((?:surname\|given name\|delrev\|softredirect\|db-unpatrolled)))\|#redirect\" \u0026\r\n !'disambig' in lcase(new_html)\r\n )\r\n )\r\n )\r\n)","name":"Creating very short new article","comments":"Users creating very short articles\r\n\r\nA size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.\r\n\r\nApparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...\r\nAdded ((softredirect)). - Ruslik\r\n\r\nAdded ((db-unpatrolled)), see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle\r\n\r\nStubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning (\"make your article longer\") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego\r\n\r\nDisabled for sysops. - KoH\r\n\r\nI limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nadd tag \"very short new article\" - Cen\r\n\r\nI rearranged conditions. - Ruslik\r\nAs did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold\r\nNope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold\r\nTry this instead... - Hersfold\r\n\r\nThere is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P\r\n\r\nAgree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen\r\n\r\nOptimizing. -TS\r\nOptimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010\r\n\r\noptimised 2015 --zzuuzz","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["very short new article"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["very short new article"]))

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories

Tags to apply:

(see Wikipedia:Tags for use and formatting)

(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)

(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)

very short new article

You are viewing an old version of this filter. The statistics quoted are for the most recent version of the filter. • Return to this filter's history.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/history/98/item/13406"