The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.

The proposed WikiProject was not created. Closing proposal due to insufficient editor interest. Ajpolino (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Description

[edit]

Information visualisation is the transformation of raw data into visual metaphors, with the intention of communicating some aspect of that data. naught101 (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


List of important pages and categories for this proposed group

[edit]


List of WikiProjects currently on the talk pages of those articles

[edit]
Please invite these and any other similar groups to join the discussion about this proposal. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Directory to find similar WikiProjects.

Why do you want to start a new group, instead of joining one of these existing groups?

[edit]
None of these groups are specific enough to be useful. Information visualisation (and related stats/data sciences) is a large field, and would benefit from having a central organising location.

Support

[edit]

Also, specify whether or not you would join the project.

  1. naught101 (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Leutha (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
- a proper file system. No link toward the data, the data itself
- three-dimensional maps, First-Person-View-style graph parsing, highly customisable projection views (Japanese SigWP offers 2D visualisation for Wikipedia articles http://sigwp.org/en/index.php/Wikipedia_Thesaurus_Visualizer)
- quality ergonomy
- client/server architecture
- advanced ontologies such as RDF and the overall field of semantic web. Looking for taxonomic data modeling, documentary queries, folksonomies
- workflow
The only project with such scope that I am aware of at the moment is Watson from IBM, I believe it is time for an open-source competitor, which again I think does not exist yet. I have not much skills to bring to your project proposal, but will keep an eye on it. BR Maxorazon (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.