The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

MultimediaGuru (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Bellagio94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
WelshAspie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
MikeBourne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Buridan 12:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

These nicks have been constructing some interesting relationships between jonathan bishop, social network service, and social network. when asked to document them properly for verifiability, a new nick appeard bellagio94 and reverted. bellagio94 may be attempt to irritate another user bellagio99, who works on social network and social network services.

on social network's history the nicks MultimediaGuru and WelshAspie coordinated to continually revert changes removing undocumented references in regard to jonathan bishop and circle of friends.

These users may in fact be Jonathan Bishop or close colleagues promoting an unsupported pov that promotes Bishop in an unverifiable manner, which would be al WP:COI issue.

Comments

I am not Welsh Aspie, though I felt the Bellagio94 edit was humorous. I think you'll find the histroy of Social Networking is taught to many students like me at Gloucestershire University and I feel its a shame I've had to get embroiled in this battle when I originally joined Wikipedia to edit pages on contemporary media theory. I know I am right about the Circle of Friends and Web of Contacts, would Gloucestershire lecturer Nina Reeves be lying to her students? --MultimediaGuru 23:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

• Possible, but I don't see severe enough disruption to hand out blocks. Activity seems stale anyway. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]