Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
All the IPs and usernames behave the same way as community-banned User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg (and Barbara Staudinger admits to be him and complains about my reverts of SU socks). They have all been blocked by me during the last 2 days. The original ban discussion is here. The cleanup project that explains what to do with his edits is Wikipedia:SU (it is inactive now, but was a large-scale effort after his ban). I don't know of any way to deal with Sheynhertz other than large-scale rangeblocks. Three years ago, I blocked all of these ranges: User:Kusma/Sheynhertz. On what ranges is Sheynhertz now? Can these ranges be blocked? Does anybody else use these ranges? How many socks are there that I missed? — Kusma talk 20:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I have asked ja:User:Los688, who just blocked some of Sheynhertz-Unbayg's sockpuppets on the Japanese Wikipedia, to comment on the situation. (Sheynhertz-Unbayg is Japanese and is also banned from the Japanese Wikipedia). — Kusma talk 16:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed MuZemike 20:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
the IP, like S-U and his socks located at Tokyo, appeared at Nikolaus von Üxküll-Gyllenband and added some categories as usually used by S-U. After a revert User:Rundmann came up and restored the IP edits. Rundmann is a newly created account and both the IP and Rundmann use a similar way to categorize articles (19th century people, X expatriates in Y, People of Y descent). HerkusMonte (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
((Sockpuppet|Sheynhertz-Unbayg))
, edit summary: "This fool man will be a banned user, sockpuppet of evil, devil";((Sockpuppet|Michael Bednarek))
((Sockpuppet|Kusma))
((Sockpuppet|Shoeofdeath))
((Sockpuppet|devil))
, edit summary: "useless fool user, will banned";Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
After 1 day's rest, 121.115.68.130 is at it again, creating inappropriate entries on DAB pages, adding stub templates, overcategorising. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Koczysz (talk · contribs) began reverting edits made by 121.115.68.130 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) shortly after that IP was flagged as a suspected sockpuppet. Displays the same pattern of comments and disregard for guidelines. older ≠ wiser 14:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
All of the accounts from the archive are Stale. Any action would need to be directed by behavior, as checkuser will not link accounts to IPs. TNXMan 15:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
The added accounts give me something to check against. Confirmed the following accounts are the same:
Special:Contributions/Quatrial – Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
I blocked for 24 hours for three-revert violation, but based on the editing pattern this is pretty clearly yet another sock. older ≠ wiser 14:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Same pattern of editing. Similar response to cleaning up edits to disambiguation pages [2] older ≠ wiser 02:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Submitted by older ≠ wiser 21:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
These were active during the 'avian surname' discussion a couple days ago. They must be socks of the above two.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
This IP must be linked too. It's going nuts adding to the 'botanical' and 'animal surname' cats. I noticed it keeps adding template:Expand German templates to its article creations.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Madness. I found this one searching through the newest article creations that used that German template. This account is brand new and heavily involved in those surname cats.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:DUCK. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
To: Michael Bednarek <mb@...> Subject: Wikipedia e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MediaWiki mailer From: Sheynhertz-Unbayg <j.milgromski@...> Message-Id: <E1Pwmrq-00072d-3n@srv277.pmtpa.wmnet> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:41:46 +0000 Shame and Death and this Czech waste. Morally bankrupt maggot, filthy scum, dirty son of bitches, rotten lunatic man. No one need you! Go ahead! No one need dictator like you. You are same fate with Ben-Ali, Qaddafi, Mubarak. http://www.youtube.com/user/Benbarzillay YosefYitzhak, meshorer, ger toshav tojruimaddu@... -- This e-mail was sent by user "Sheynhertz-Unbayg" on the English Wikipedia to user "Michael Bednarek". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents. The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, or any information about his/her e-mail account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this e-mail or take any other action that might disclose his/her identity. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Email>.
Clerk note: Blocked below. DQ.alt (t) (e) 17:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Similar edits to Sheynhertz-Unbayg. Geschichte (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Here's another one, clearly Sheynhertz. —Кузьма討論 05:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
+1 more duck. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Similar edits to Adelranz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki):
– Ajltalk 09:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed the following are the same:
Group 2
Administrator note All blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 00:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Similar edits to Adelranz (see IP's contribs) – Ajltalk 21:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Special:Contributions/220.220.195.80 – WP:DUCK; see also WHOIS. Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No comment on the IPs, but the following are Confirmed matches to each other:
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Here's one more (already blocked): Ebentafel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
A note: Just blocking the accounts without actually deleting / reverting the edits / cleaning up the pages does not achieve anything useful. He just moves to a new account (I think he creates them on other language Wikipedias anyway) and continues. Is there something that can be done other than rangeblocking all of Japan? —Кузьма討論 06:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
WP:DUCK: (already blocked, adding here for reference):
Michael Bednarek (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed:
Administrator note All accounts blocked and tagged. IP listed in suspected socks is autoblocked. Elockid (Talk) 19:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
WP:DUCK for Al.Sparsky
By chance has he done Italian related pages in the past? the 125 IP comes from same country as past sockpuppets and is doing similar things. Off to fix 100 or so articles. Oh joy. Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: Currently finding ranges. From what I can tell you, they look promising. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 12:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed: Also self endorsing for a sleeper check. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 14:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Clerk note: Could I get a collateral damage check for a hardblock on the ranges above? See archives for reason. Elockid (Talk) 19:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Administrator note I've blocked and tagged all the accounts. In the meanwhile, I've softblock all the ranges above to help with some of IP sockpuppetry. Elockid (Talk) 19:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't know where to report this. It is back as 58.93.165.73 and changing articles that were restored yesterday. Bgwhite (talk) 07:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
He is back. IP is from Japan and doing the usual editing. Bgwhite (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator note 114.183.48.0/20 blocked 3 months. Elockid (Talk) 20:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
He is back... IP from Japan and making similar edits as before Bgwhite (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No comment on the IPs, but the following are Confirmed matches:
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
See recent editing history; readding information previously added by confirmed sock Schmeckl (talk · contribs) only a day earlier. A fairly obvious WP:DUCK. elektrikSHOOS 05:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
From what I can see using just non-checkuser tools, the ranges 60.36.0.0/16 and 60.35.0.0/16 seem to not have been used by anyone but Sheynhertz in the last two years. If this is more or less correct, I'd like to block them for a while. —Кузьма討論 07:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Special:Contributions/121.117.181.246 – WP:DUCK Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
WP:DUCK Just appeared. Suggest looking for sleepers. Voceditenore (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
All registered accounts are Confirmed as Sheynhertz-Unbayg. I have hardblocked a couple of IP ranges, but that may not do much, as this person encompasses an entire /12 range. No comment with regard to the above-reported IP addresses. –MuZemike 17:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Mass reverting Kusma, recreated categories that S-U has made in the past. I blocked and nuked. Syrthiss (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Sleeper check please. Elockid (Talk) 15:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
WP:duck Bgwhite (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator note Mauerei blocked. Elockid (Talk) 18:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed: Self-endorsing to see if anything else is lurking around. Elockid (Talk) 18:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
WP:DUCK. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed, along with Sesselfus (talk · contribs) and Koglmuller (talk · contribs). TNXMan 13:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Administrator note All blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 14:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
More of the same. Already blocked and tagged, but need a CU for a sleeper check and if possible an IP block. I would also appreciate if a CU could do a nice, full sweep on the ranges listed at User:Elockid/Notes (IP ranges)#Long-term socker 1. The symbol (N) means not blocked yet. M.Magruc managed to circumvent detection last check and this account, Steinhand (talk · contribs) circumvented numerous checks and was only found when I asked a CU if I could hardblock 2 of the ranges they have been to be using. Elockid (Talk) 13:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed the following are the same:
Administrator note Thanks for the quick response. All handled. Elockid (Talk) 14:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
The usual. Sleeper check please. Elockid (Talk) 18:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An old account that has sprung to life in the past couple of days. Creating and working on disambiguation pages, quack. Working on Jewish pages, quack. Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed the following are matches to each other and Likely matches to accounts in the archive:
An older account that's working in the same areas that Sheynhertz-Unbayg was known to work in. WP:DUCK may apply here. However, since the account's contributions are largely positive, I don't want to unduly assume bad faith. Nonetheless, it's something worth investigating. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed plus the following (I've already blocked and tagged them):
Also IP blocked. Elockid (Talk) 16:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The bulk of user's edits appear to be reverting rollbacks of User:Shalshelet's changes.
Examples:
Looks like a duck to me. Given the number of recently-blocked socks, I think it's time to see if there are even more of them. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. I can't think of many reasons why a new user would spend all of their time only reverting reversions of a banned user. I've tagged the new pages they created to replace the ones previously deleted under G5. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 01:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed. No other accounts found. Elockid (Talk) 01:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Both brought to my attention by User:Dougweller. WP:DUCK (new editor, Jewish-German surnames, redirects), likely linked to the (now archived) 11 June 2012 sock report. – sgeureka t•c 15:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Both Confirmed and blocked/tagged. Also, IP blocked. Elockid (Talk) 15:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Another potential SU sock, based on behavioral evidence. Worth at least checking up on. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 01:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Definitely him. Blocked indef. IP blocked. Elockid (Talk) 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
See typical behaviors at long-term abuse case. Only two edits are to a page within their usual topic range and SU's LTA page. The address also geolocates to Japan (again, see the LTA case). Requesting checkuser as it may also be useful to check for sleepers. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.