MohammedBinAbdullah

MohammedBinAbdullah (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
29 June 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
  1. Same username. both the accounts have recent edits on Sarabjit Singh and Raja Pervaiz Ashraf The edits were disruptive and were reverted. the Older account has several warnings and an ANI report as well. DBigXray 19:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Updated: also added RiseofIslam (talk · contribs) a new account created today, the edits, reverts and talk page behavior (blanking warnings) show that this is yet another sock of user Muhammad Bin Abdullah--DBigXray 17:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. diff on Sarabjit Singh 1 and 2 Edit warring the exact same disputed comment into the article.
  4. Account RiseofIslam (talk · contribs) was created after an SPI notice was give to Muhammad Bin Abdullah (talk · contribs) --DBigXray 12:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
25 July 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

This diff is quite telling [1] but if you want you can read further. MahdiTheGuidedOne is "newly" created account that almost right away create a new article SEOquake with good knowledge of Wiki markup.After few days he create highly controversial article Israel and state terrorism adding large chunks text everytime with good wiki markup when it was put on AFD User:Regulararmy has voted keep [2] with exactly the same rational like the IP [3]. The user [Regulararmy] edited the same article like the Mahdi [4] ,[5].

This user is probably old user that returned to evade his block not clear who it is but the list of blocked and topic banned users at WP:ARBPIA is pretty long. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The listed accounts all voted Keep in quick succession at AfD for an article created by MahdiTheGuidedOne. All accounts are very recent. Regulararmy has made two edits, one being to a thread started by Mahdi at Talk:Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation. IP's first edits were to the AfD. Accounts are knowledgeable in Wiki mark-up and are likely to belong to a banned user. Ankh.Morpork 16:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Voicetermsvoiceterms added; attempted recreation of the page with (IIRC) virtually the same content at Israel and State-sponsored terrorism. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

All of the listed accounts are  Confirmed matches to each other plus:

No comment on IP. There appears to be some relation to MohammedBinAbdullah (talk · contribs). Elockid (Talk) 19:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


27 July 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Recreating Israel and state terrorism an article created by the master. Looks like an obvious duck to me. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Confirmed. No other accounts present. I can try to do another IP block if things gets out of hand again. No long-term blocks though. Elockid (Talk) 20:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

03 August 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

[6] Rather obvious Darkness Shines (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

What is obvious? Hitstitlehitstitle (talk) 20:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
05 August 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Case filer comment here. --Example 22:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only a suspicion, username matches previous pattern used by other socks. Quite possibly wrong, but no harm in checking. FishBarking? 22:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Giftanodegiftanode got caught on the last sweep from the SP I started' it had nothing o do with edits. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Thank you Dennis. I will keep an eye on the new guy for a bit to make sure. IMO he is not a sock Darkness Shines (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I am doing the same, Darkness Shines - I've added an ATOM feed of his contribs to my feed reader program, and I will get notified whenever he contributes. Thank you for the info anyway, Dennis - I appreciate your review of the entry I made. FishBarking? 23:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
16 October 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Just adding for reference. Elockid (Talk) 03:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

01 February 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Reference report. No further action needed. Elockid (Talk) 05:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More