Mangoeater1000

Mangoeater1000 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

22 February 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Has all the hallmarks of Mangoeater1000:

Editing issues by this user were raised at WP:ANI#NYU_Tandon_School_of_Engineering. Ping me if you need diffs, but edit history seems quite clear to me. Given history, prolific socking, and severity, asking for CU. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 18:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The accusation is quite ridiculous. Looking at the timeline of Mangoeater100, I was not even at NYU when that account operated. Futhermore none of my edits added puffery or where troublesome. I edited extensively several college articles not related to NYU. Given that the account that accused me is an SPA [1], that only edits Tandon article, that account ought be checked not mine.--FRDHU (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD:, when Mangoeater100 operated, I was a student at Fordham University. I created this account most probably there. And I'm currently a student at NYU, but not in Tandon School. That's a lot of disclosure there.--FRDHU (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

21 March 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Brand new account. Editing on NYIT and other "institutes of technology" pages. Duck is quietly quacking.

Prolific sockpuppeter known to make sleepers. Asking for CU. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 04:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked by Gogo Dodo. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 04:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 March 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK. Editing on pages the LTA page documents as common targets for Mango (NYIT, Sweet Briar College). Even made an Islam edit, one of Mango's newer areas: [2]

Requesting sleeper check. User is prolific socker. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 03:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Compare [3] to edit by past puppet [4]. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 04:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Remove talk page access too please? See [5]. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 05:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Materialscientist (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged. Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

New account. Editing on Islam/Iran related articles (e.g., [6]) and restoring old generally positive content to NYIT ([7]).

Quietly quacking duck. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 05:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Edits on NYU related to alumni. Edits on Ali Khamenei. Username references Iran. MangoEater has interest in all 3. DUCK

Sleeper check? EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 03:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


05 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Got another for you Materialscientist. New account editing on NYUTSoE right after other sock was blocked. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 05:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK... another older account that edited on various university pages but primarily on NYU. Edits come a few days after last sock was blocked. If you really need diffs or more evidence, ping me. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 21:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije: Mangoeater fixates on New York University of its Tandon School of Engineering. Compare to edits of past socks who also edit on the school's page: Special:Contributions/Ringopop, Special:Contributions/Iranian_gal, Special:Contributions/Enrique_Almighty. Similarly, recent socks have a habit of popping up after a few months, past edits being on other university pages (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Current sock has edited on Carnegie Mellon-related pages ([14]), as has past sock ([15]). Same for Boston University (current, old). And New Jersey Institute of Technology (current, old, both updating same info). And Fordham (current, old). Current sock was disruptive on NYU page back in January, talking about promotional edits, something socks of Mango have done before. The only new thing about this account is it's editing on Thailand articles instead of Iran or Islamic-related ones. Materialscientist has dealt with this user's socks in the past if you want a second opinion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 22:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Older account that recently reactivated to edit on New York University related articles (like past socks). Edits on NYU were regarding ranking of the school (similar to past socks).

User is a prolific socker. Requesting sleeper check. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 04:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Narrow focus on New York University articles. User updates USNWR rankings (compare sock to Bennythestar). Additions are generally promotional of NYU, a typical MO for Mangoeater.

Admittedly other edits by the account cast doubt as they are not the typical targets of Mangoeater, but the focus on NYU and its ranking as well as the recency of the account's creation warrant an SPI imho. Requesting CU evidence and sleeper check given the sockmaster's history of making multiple accounts. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 21:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Ridhaam is now blocked, but seems rather DUCK to me (editing on NYU, MIT, and Iran).

Kajolky's edit ([16]) restored edit by previous sock ([17])

CU requested for sleeper check as usual given Mango's history EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 04:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 May 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK... editing on other university pages that past socks have edited on (e.g., Brown Uni). Editing on New York University related pages, including Institute of Technology pages.

Prolific sockpuppeter. Requesting CU for sleeper check and other active socks EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 15:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@DoRD: Is Mangoeater banned? Or just blocked? Was going to rollback sock edits, but recalled that rollback is only for banned editors' edits. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 19:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that he's banned, but per WP:EVADE, edits made by socks of blocked users may also be reverted. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 May 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreated page that was original created by a sock EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 06:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


20 May 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Yet another recreation of Jeffrey P Freidberg. Wgolf (talk) 22:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Basing some of this off of Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Mangoeater1000 for ease. This account's first edit was a talk page message regarding New York Institute of Technology, one of the many pages Mangoeater targets ([18]). This edit was out of the blue and shows a knowledge of wiki syntax as well as happenings about that article.

Mangoeater likes to edit college ranking info. This account has done so a number of times ([19], [20], [21]). Compare to past socks: [22], [23]

This account removed negative info about New York University, Mangoeater's favorite topic ([24]).

To me, this is quacking. I know everyone's level of DUCK is different, but the association between topics and behavior is there. Magoeater is a prolific socker. Asking for CU for sleepers and connection to past socks. I've seen a number of accounts that were suspicious but didn't have time to pull diffs on. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

See Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Mangoeater1000 for some history. Mango likes to edit on NYU related pages, often in ways that boost its reputation (e.g., [25]). Mango socks have edited about alumni before (e.g., [26]). This editor has edited extensively (100+ edits) on New York University, many of which are about alumni or some other prestige issue (e.g., [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]).

Adityaedits has edited on pages past Mango socks have edited on:

Mango is a prolific socker who seems to vary his editing interests to throw off suspicion (e.g., he was editing articles about Iran for a bit). But NYU was always a central focus. That trend seems apparent here as well. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding evidence for BrownAlumnus: Past Mango sock have edited in ways on Brown University to reduce info about the prestige of the school. For example, he has removed info about rankings from the lead and edited to put the actual endowment into question (e.g., [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]). BrownAlumnus shows similar behavior ([39], [40]). They have interacted with past socks ([41], [42]) as well. The evidence here is admittedly more tenuous (and there are other Brown-related usernames that I couldn't find enough evidence for), but the pattern appears similar enough to warrant investigation. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of John Gilbert (engineer) Wgolf (talk) 19:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

KrakatoaKatie asked for some behavioral evidence. From the LTA page and the archives, we know Mango likes to edit about the prestige and alumni of NYU, the Tandon school, and the NYIT.

EvergreenFir (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One editor-can't remember who has been paroling these articles, as well as a possible related article of David Goodman (engineer). Wgolf (talk) 22:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

There are some technical differences that keep me from calling them confirmed, so  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Katietalk 22:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'm sold. All accounts blocked without tags. Katietalk 23:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Quacking to me. Editing on New York Institute of Technology about alumni, a mango classic. In fact, that's all they've edited on.

CU requested since mango is a prolific socker and usually other active socks are found EvergreenFir (talk) 07:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Many edits on page usually frequented by Mangoeater1000 (e.g., New York University). Edits are related to alumni, similar to past socks ([47], [48]). Similar behavior on City College of New York too ([49])

Moved page created by Mango sock from draft to mainspace (Robert E. Evanson; [50]).

Mango is a prolific socker, so requesting CU for other active socks and sleepers. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralizationsAreBad and DoRD: I wasn't 100% sure on Notable Sweety, but the evidence suggested it was Mango. But if Notable Sweety is confirmed to those other three, I'm 99.8% sure it's Mango.

Some of Mango's main target pages per Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Mangoeater1000 are New York University (NYU), List of New York Institute of Technology alumni, and New York Institute of Technology (NYIT). Mango likes to edit about alumni and faculty, especially their awards and achievements, and university rankings (e.g., [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]).

Chan-ocha made a series of disruptive edits related to the late Thai king (e.g., [61], [62], [63], and even on New York Institute of Technology). A past Mango sock named Adityaedits edited on Reactions to the death of Bhumibol Adulyadej ([64], [65], [66]). Chan-ocha edited within minutes of other socks (Tin Soldier and Trepcost for example). Note that Chan-ocha and Tin Soldier matched back in the 12 December 2016 report and were blocked as socks. This behavior of self-interaction is seen in this edit between two Mango socks Brown Alumnus and Eagle Beagle Giggle ([67]).

Trepcost started with a series of edits on New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine back on 28 May 2016. NYIT is one of Mango's targets. They resumed in November with edits on NYIT (e.g., [68], [69]). Trepcost made ranking related edits on a number of university pages ([70], [71], [72]). Trepcost made a number of edits on NYIT's alumni page, adding alumni ([73], [74], [75], [76],

Adam Parori edited on the Tandon article promoting its accomplishments (e.g., [77]). Mango has an extensive history of socking on this article (socks: FRDHU, Skm415, Ringopop, Iranian gal). Adam Parori edited in the list of alumni for NYU, a common Mango target ([78], [79], [80]). Adam Parori edited to discuss NYU's rank ([81]).

I noticed that Brew swick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) created Jill Wruble, a person added by to the NYIT alumni page and subsequently wikilinked by Trepcost ([82]). Similarly, Brock Lender (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) created Ben Finley which is another NYIT alum and Trepcost wikilinked to that page ([83]). Should I add another SPI for those users, or can you just check it in this report? I've seen Mango do this before, but don't want to dig for diffs (esp. since delete pages are hard for me to find). I think the sock net is wider than the CU indicates based on this... (or maybe a paid editing ring?)

Taken together, these exhibit classic Mangoeater1000 behaviors to me.

EvergreenFir (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Most probably, these are all conspiracies of the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The abominable Wiki troll, taking revenge against me because I got many of his IPs and accounts blocked recently. I'm a doctor who graduated from New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine. I edited Wikipedia extensively, and none of my edits constitute vandalism (unless you think updating rankings or adding notable alumni that pop up in the alumni category page are vandalism). The purpose of these kinds of investigations are to find and block accounts that are distructive, not the ones that edit contructively. That said, I just read Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mangoeater1000, and I find it highly amusing, and a waste of time for everybody involved. I personally don't think that a university of the stature of NYU or Brown University could use "boosterism" on Wikipedia. Category:New York University alumni, has over 4000 notable alumni with Wikipedia-articles,[84] while Brown University has nearly 1600 notable alumni.[85]. Naturally people will try to add alumni to those articles, but if you keep blocking all the ranges from where they edit, you are essentially blocking people from building Wikipedia. I'm a very busy person in real life and don't have time for this ridiculous crap, but I guess many people who edit Wikipedia these days don't have much work in real life.--Trepcost (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about Mangoeater1000's bans

My suggestion: Since you guys seem to have problem with @Mangoeater1000: editing university alumni, achievements, awards, endowments, and rankings,[86] I suggest that you unblock Mangoeater1000, put a topic ban on him for university and university-related articles, and let them know that if they ever create any more sock, then they will be banned forever. This will hopefully put an end to all this.--Trepcost (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with EvergreenFir's analysis based on the users' substantial edits to pages Mangoeater1000 returns to time and time again that Trepcost and Adam Parori are WP:DUCK socks, especially Trepcost. Trepcost literally requested an unblock for the sockmaster right here, can you quack any louder than that? Sro23 (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Trepcost: Mango is already site banned. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive280#Proposed_site_ban_of_Mangoeater1000 EvergreenFir (talk) 00:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir: I think the site-ban was done in a hurry with the few voting there, not actually doing a proper research on this editor. I checked some edits of Mangoeater1000, the original account, and it seems they were misinformed on how Wikipedia works. It doesn't look like they were vandalising or intentionally making disruptive edits. Also, I noticed that the first sock investigation from 28 July 2012,[87] and some subsequent ones were done while Mango was unblocked, and was not edit-warring with anyone.[88] I don't know why the sockpuppet investigation was opened in the first place. That said, I believe it's best for us all to not waste more time on this stupid stuff, let Mango (with university and university-related articles topic ban) come back and edit from orginal account, and everyone, including checkusers can keep an eye on him.--Trepcost (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Technically Notable Sweety (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed to:

But it was busy technically, so to repeat, would like some behavioral confirmation. NativeForeigner Talk 10:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, going to list a few more accounts I just found. Again, check behavior.

 Confirmed to mango are:

NativeForeigner Talk 10:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

DUCK. Editing solely on NYU related pages. Editing on a page Robert Ubell which was created by and extensively edited by past Mango sock Skm415. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


Previous socks have similar names mentoning Iran:Irani12, Iranianmuslim, Iranimaan, Iranian gal, etc. Samoa Rusev is now blocked for sockpuppetry but had continued the edit wars on Bill Goldberg that Trepcost started. Requesting CU because there are likely more sleepers out there, Ali popped up right after Samoa Rusev got indeffed and continued the Goldberg edit war. LM2000 (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Sticks to the same pattern of Universities + pro wrestling. Intersection at George Washington University: [89] [90], making the same kinds of edits to Bret Hart: [91] [92]. Sro23 (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

All three editing on prestigious colleges including NYU. Mango has done good hand-bad hand editing before which appears to be happening with these accounts. Drmies blocked Comfortkong as a sock already. Duck to me. Ping me if you need more diffs. Given this uses vast history of socking, cu needed. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: there was a bit a while ago where he edited negatively about the name change for Tandon School of Engineering. But we'd likely need to move to a new spi page. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed BUT! This is not Mangoeater--this is not a case of good hand, bad hand: Mango's good hand is for NYU, his bad hand for everything else; this cat plays the other way around, with the good hand playing for and from Dartmouth. I don't know if we need to start a separate SPI; I checked a whole bunch of IPs and found many accounts, but only these two are master and sock. Drmies (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Could you clarify which accounts are confirmed to each other? You say "these two are master and sock", but three accounts are listed above. ~ Rob13Talk 02:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:BU Rob13, Comfortkong is a confirmed sock of the Mango Man. The other two are each other's socks and have nothing to do with Mango Man, at least technically. Spiritually they're cut from the same cloth, but with conflicting allegiances. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)'[reply]

28 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


Usual interest in Ali Khamenei and professional wrestling articles. LM2000 (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije: Same diffs:[93][94]LM2000 (talk) 08:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Psychonot has been checkuser-blocked by User:DoRD but in my opinion still needs a sock tag on their user page. I am not aware of anything else that needs to be done. EdJohnston (talk) 01:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 February 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


See edits to Mercy College, created by a known Mango sock. DoRD, Bbb23, I would like for you to have a look at this, given your experience with the master. You will see what I've already seen, and you know what to do with it. Here's hoping that I'm wrong and that this does not jive with the Mango editor. Drmies (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Drmies (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Follows the established patterns of edits to pro wrestling ([95] [96]) + universities ([97] [98] [99] [100]). Requesting CU due to the high probability of there also being sleepers, per the archive. Sro23 (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Supporting CU request. This user is a prolific socker. Requesting sleeper check too. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

29 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

These accounts have been recently disrupting Mercy College (New York) and the talk page (accounts #2 -- #4 are already blocked due to duck).

Roostcadge added a protected edit request mentioning "for some reason" the article was reverted to old version: Special:Diff/903950137. The other accounts were restoring sock edits at the article: Special:Diff/902746510 (restored Dino Moro and Karperfish's edits).

CU to confirm. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 06:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I have no animosity towards you. If you are not socking then you will be cleared and have nothing to worry about. I wish you luck in getting articles elevated to GA status.LM2000 (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


User:JJRambo, a confirmed sock of Mangoeater1000, created Henry Goldmark, which was salted. Ariarip later created Henry C. Goldmark. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

More