The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the uploader says the source is a 1975 copy of Motor Trend magazine. Sources do not have to be online to be valid. Dianna (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1975 Chevy Vega Ad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Without source that allows verification of licence and description Bulwersator (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Dianna (talk) 01:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AD-1pivotwingaircraft.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From source: " For print or commercial use, please contact: Smithsonian Institution". Does work of National Air and Space Museum qualify as work of the United States Federal Government? Bulwersator (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It appears the Smithonian's image use criterion are quite similar to the CC-BY-NC license - which is, alas, not a Wikipedia-compatible one. Also the filename is misleading - this is not the AD-1. I have uploaded a new, freely licensed picture to replace this. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Works by the Smithsonian Institution are in the public domain as ((PD-USGov-SI)). However, works hosted on the Smithsonian Institution's web site are, as far as I have understood, sometimes made by other people, and it seems that it isn't always clearly indicated who the creator is, so it may be difficult to determine the copyright status of any given work. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; United States does not have freedom of panorama for two-dimensional works. Dianna (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Idol Experience sign.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo is unfree (File:The American Idol Experience.png), long text on left is probably also copyrighted. Bulwersator (talk) 04:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; it's an unused non-free file. Dianna (talk) 01:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lifeonearthcover.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader owns license or has permission to release it. Presumed non-free album-cover. DMacks (talk) 09:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing admin: please check User talk:Mrrooftop#Possibly unfree File:Lifeonearthcover.png for possible response from uploader (editor is currently blocked, so cannot respond here but was instructed that he could respond on his talk-page). DMacks (talk) 15:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; it was a non-free file used only in userspace. Dianna (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paradigm of life pic3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Do not agree with PD-ineligible. MGA73 (talk) 10:35, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Since our article had no pic, I added the necessary templates and placed the image in the article. Dianna (talk) 01:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:This is the cover for the song "Stealin".jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a cover. The license chosen is ((PD-URAA)). I do not think we have enough evidence that this is a valid license tag. MGA73 (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norman Francis Butler House, Walla Walla, Washington, 1992.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I recently realized that a number of photos I uploaded may be under copyright violation. Though published/released by the federal government, National Register of Historic Places application photos are apparently generally not considered public domain since they were not taken by government employees Squiffybob (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnson Bridge, Walla Walla County, Washington, 1982.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I recently realized that a number of photos I uploaded may be under copyright violation. Though published/released by the federal government, National Register of Historic Places application photos are apparently generally not considered public domain since they were not taken by government employees Squiffybob (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirkman House (Walla Walla, Washington), 1974.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I recently realized that a number of photos I uploaded may be under copyright violation. Though published/released by the federal government, National Register of Historic Places application photos are apparently generally not considered public domain since they were not taken by government employees Squiffybob (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Ludwigs House (Walla Walla, Washington), 1980.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I recently realized that a number of photos I uploaded may be under copyright violation. Though published/released by the federal government, National Register of Historic Places application photos are apparently generally not considered public domain since they were not taken by government employees Squiffybob (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oman National Emblem.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this is an "official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin", but there is no evidence that this is correct. Commons:COM:L doesn't have an entry for Oman. Stefan2 (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair-use rationale Dianna (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erwin Panofsky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The template claims that the photo was published before 1923, but the uploader didn't provide any evidence of publication. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IDriveSync web.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: software screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep: I have added the necessary templates for us to keep it for fair use. Dianna (talk) 01:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged ((CC-BY-SA-2.5)) and claimed to be a "Self Photographed image", but this is a logo from [1]. There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder or that the copyright holder has agreed to release this under a free license. —Bkell (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete We have no use for this file as the hospital is fictional. Dianna (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle Grace Hospital Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: contains a logo. Stefan2 (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.