The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moran Speaks to Press About Mark Center.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid reason for PD claim Eeekster (talk) 02:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weerawut Kayem in 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be lifted from http://whotalking.com/flickr/Muangthong+United Eeekster (talk) 04:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benwick Signwhole2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Violates Commons:COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Surely this is a work of artistic craftsmanship rather than a graphic work. Thincat (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The sign is a painting. Paintings are very different from the examples of works of artistic craftsmanship at Commons:COM:FOP#United Kingdom and are specifically excluded at Commons:COM:FOP#Australia (the Australian definition is supposed to be identical or almost identical). Instead, paintings appear to be typical graphic works. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hand-painted tiles are proposed as coming into the craftsmanship category so it is not the case that all painting is graphic. This is a village sign, not a painting, and it is photographed as such. Taking the sign as a whole, the wrought iron scrolls display craftsmanship (cf wrought iron gates). Courts take a sensible view of these sorts of issues. The sign is a work of craftsmanship (look at how it is constructed) and it is artistic. Thincat (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-NJD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this is an "official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin", but it seems to be a work of a US state government and not by the federal government, so the licence claim is wrong. It might be ((PD-ineligible)), but the art to the left looks a bit complex, so I'm not sure. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-PHI-Flyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this is an "official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin", but it seems to be a work of a US state government and not by the federal government, so the licence claim is wrong. It might be ((PD-ineligible)), but the art to the left looks a bit complex, so I'm not sure. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statelib3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licence claim appears to be a misunderstanding of the difference between public domain and freedom of information. Besides, no source is given. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaiko nadaipayanam 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because This image is from the MDMK political party's website used for promotional purposes, demonstrating their work." Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaiko nadaipayanam 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because This image is from the MDMK political party's website used for promotional purposes, demonstrating their work." Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaiko nadaipayanam 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because This image is from the MDMK political party's website used for promotional purposes, demonstrating their work." Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaiko nadaipayanam uniform1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because This image is from the MDMK political party's website used for promotional purposes, demonstrating their work." Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treue-Dienste-der-NVA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because German Democratic Republic doesn't exist anymore." Copyrights previously held by East Germany are currently held by West Germany as far as I can tell. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The licence has now been changed to ((PD-GermanGov)). However, this claim is based on § 5 Abs.1 UrhG, and Commons:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review tells that § 5 Abs.1 UrhG only applies to literary works. This is not a literary work. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tide Austral (AWM 301506).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because Copyright status is listed as 'clear' on the AWM images database. This photo was taken in 1954 and is out of copyright under Australian law." Unfortunately, it was taken after 1945, so it is only out of copyright in Australia but not in the United States. Wikipedia only allows Australian photos which are out of copyright in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, at least for now. Noting the Commons deletion request linked below, if we end up with a permission that extends to this image, then this image may be restored by any administrator. Also noting that this image was orphaned at the time of deletion, I would strongly recommend restoring this image only for the purposes of moving it to Commons and then deleting it again under F8. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rachel Bright.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is free according to a claim by Commons:User:Famefad, but the image doesn't come from Commons: it comes from the www.famefad.com website. We need OTRS evidence that Commons:User:Famefad has permission to publish works from the www.famefad.com website under free licences. Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, my mistake. — M.Mario (T/C) 14:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait to see if Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rachel Bright at the 2012 Inside Soap Awards.JPG gives us OTRS permission first. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1951 French rugby league tourists team photo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• ((PD-URAA)) claim is wrong: this was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1949 Wallabies with BledisloeCup image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1949 grand final.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1946NMFC3rdsside.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1951 jubilee celebration.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Also unsourced. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1954 Newtown Grand Finalists.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1954 NSWRFL grand final.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1954 Royal Yacht Gothic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1954SMHTooth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was taken after 1945. The photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This image has been created by me from material at whose base is a photograph taken by an uncredited photographer and taken and published in Australia before 1 January 1955. That image is in the public domain. Otherthinker (talk) 05:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • The image is in the public domain in Australia. However, it is not in the public domain in the United States. Wikipedia requires images to be in the public domain in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.