The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peachfuzz lads.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This one may or may not be free. I see the user is Schmozzle, and on other articles, that he has made, that name is used in the sources. This one is a tricky one. Either way, does not need to me put on the commons. Undead Warrior (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This pic is free. It was taken of the band Peachfuzz (which I was in) by a friend. I own the rights to the photo, which was also used on our first CD. Thanks for making the comment and for following up. Schmozzle —Preceding undated comment added 03:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Persis khambatta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Her hair was cut at the set of Star Trek and this photo is from that situation, http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xagxzo_persis-khambatta-s-star-trek-headsh_lifestyle, by all good faith: This file is not own work, the "self-made" claim is simply untrue. Martin H. (talk) 03:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:*Boiler1.5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image looks like a promotional one, uploader claims that he created it entirely by himself. Svick (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scorpion1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Highly doubt this could be the work of the uploader. — ξ^xplicit 21:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are many highly talented individuals out there, and this site tends to attract quite a few of them. I say keep this one for now, but try and contact the original submitter for some verification. Digital art really pops up quite a bit, and for all I know, this may have been a pencil sketch and then scanned onto the computer. (Doubt it was that, would be some more information on this image if it was...) Either way, I honestly don't think it would be too far fetched for this to be the uploader's original work. Undead Warrior (talk) 06:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  The uploader made a grand total of two edits, the other being adding promotional material to their talk page, which was deleted. This is the reason for my feeling of doubt. Additionally, TinEye brings up five results for this exact image, at higher resolutions, I might add. — ξ^xplicit 06:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.