The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith that the uploader is correct that this logo is somehow public domain, if so, it's unused and UE. I can't figure out what Romainian political party it represents (the other uploaders were File:PDL logo.png and File:PD logo.png), but I'd assume it's actually non-free and orphaned. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no freedom of panorama in the United States; is a derivative work of the horse sculpture. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be scan of illustration from a book, A Series of Unfortunate Events. Uploader claims to hold copyright, but copyright likely held by publisher. Radiant chains (talk) 12:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Claims public domain, but source given at flickr states "All rights reserved" Radiant chains (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As this is an image of a TV character, it is highly unlikely that the image is, as claimed, self-created. It is more likely a screenshot or a promotional image. The character's article already has an identifying image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Description says "I created this work entirely by taking a screenshot using windows movie maker," so yeah, most definitely unfree.--Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all three: Nominator's concerns have not been addressed. The uploader should feel free to reupload these images, but without the watermarks.

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is watermarked "APN-Vista" - not sure what that is but uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those watermarks are created by me, these pictures are created by me. If you require further info, it was taken using Canon and also the other photo details have also been uploaded (look in Metadata), these info will not be available for photos taken from net or other sources. I hope it clarifies your fears regarding the copyright holder. I hope there is no rule that images being uploaded should not be watermarked. In that case I can upload one without watermark also. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 05:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Adding_images (section: User-created images):

User-created images should not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use, unless, of course, the image is intended to demonstrate watermarking, distortion etc. and is used in the related article. All photo credit should be in a summary on the image description page. These may be tagged ((Watermark)).

Radiant chains (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is watermarked "APN-Vista" - not sure what that is but uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those watermarks are created by me, these pictures are created by me. If you require further info, it was taken using Canon and also the other photo details have also been uploaded (look in Metadata), these info will not be available for photos taken from net or other sources. I hope it clarifies your fears regarding the copyright holder. I hope there is no rule that images being uploaded should not be watermarked. In that case I can upload one without watermark also. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 05:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is watermarked "APN-Vista" - not sure what that is but uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those watermarks are created by me, these pictures are created by me. If you require further info, it was taken using Canon and also the other photo details have also been uploaded (look in Metadata), these info will not be available for photos taken from net or other sources. I hope it clarifies your fears regarding the copyright holder. I hope there is no rule that images being uploaded should not be watermarked. In that case I can upload one without watermark also. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File has been replaced by a lower resolution image with name Eloy_Ocean.jpg Cdl obelix (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image was created by Lila Designs in the Netherlands unlikely to be the work of the uploader, refer deleted image File:Ailivery.gif MilborneOne (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mr.Z-man (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploaded by Footage (talk · contribs), who has been indefblocked for numerous copyright violations. Claims to be own work, but found on Google here. Blueboy96 22:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mr.Z-man (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Footage (talk · contribs), who has been blocked indefinitely for numerous copyright violations. Claims to be own work, but found by Durova on Google here. Blueboy96 22:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can vouch for the fact that I took this photo and uploaded it to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Terpsiphone_paradisi.jpg - but presumably he has cropped the image and claimed ownership for the derivative ! Shyamal (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of a copyrighted character from The Sagara Family it is unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright to this image. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 23:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader had uploaded some other images as sourced from here (warning: may be NWS) before realizing that we'd just call them copyvios. This image looks like others I have deleted from the same uploader. (ESkog)^(Talk) 11:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.