The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puss in Boots The Last Wish poster.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZX2006XZ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No actual stated purpose in the non-free usage rationale. This teaser poster is not the subject of significant sourced commentary nor is it the primary visual identification. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose was to illustrate the sequel section. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. To follow up on what I said earlier, the purpose of the file was for visual identification of the "Sequel" section in Puss in Boots (2011 film). Don't worry, I will state that on the file's page ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Since there is an invalid fair use rationale with no purpose stated. There is no critical commentary of the poster failing WP:NFCC and the article already has a movie poster in the infobox for identification purposes. Aspects (talk) 23:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZX2006XZ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free logo is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. It's use is purely decorative. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See, Jurassic World: Dominion. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. See Jurassic World Dominion#Development. ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The logo fails WP:NFCC#3a due to the the infobox poster. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paw Patrol The Might Movie logo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZX2006XZ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free logo is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. It's use is purely decorative. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See, Jurassic World: Dominion. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. See Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film)#Future. ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Since there is an invalid fair use rationale with no purpose stated. There is no critical commentary of the poster failing WP:NFCC and the article already has a movie poster in the infobox for identification purposes. Aspects (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bogerurk.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by VeryExitedScholar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

We need evidence that the board game is also freely licensed (a Google search for "Bogerurk" did not return any relevant results). Copyright issues aside, the image is of low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BOSSPHOENIX.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AUburnTiger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I could find no evidence that this logo is freely licensed. Copyright issues aside, the organization does not appear to be notable. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brian Tayler Plaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thelongyard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in Australia. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avril Lavigne's Sextuple American platinum record for "Let Go".jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blinkman44 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work of copyrighted album cover. Only used on user page. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avril Lavigne's Let Go quadruple platinum record.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blinkman44 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work of copyrighted album cover. Only used on user page. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Académie de l'Impart de Montréal.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Juventusfan7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid fair use, an image of an old team logo doesn't significantly improve the article, especially when we have the much more relevant current logo File:Impact Academy.png in the article Joseph2302 (talk) 09:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real Esteli FC.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yxifix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid fair use, an image of an old team logo doesn't significantly improve the article, especially when we have the much more relevant current logo File:Real Esteli 2.png in the article Joseph2302 (talk) 09:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlesanpr.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luiscarson01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

• File:PrimeraAsan.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• File:Tunneros.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Invalid fair uses, images of old team logo doesn't significantly improve the article, especially when we have the much more relevant current logo File:San Luis F.C. logo.jpg in the article. Also violates WP:NOTGALLERY (though this is way less important than the fair use violations) Joseph2302 (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo PiS jasne.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Piotr Bart (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The Commons file this shadows claims it's public domain. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 13:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file on Wikipedia was uploaded before the court stated it's in public domain. Piotr Bart (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodies Bodies Bodies.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abskiee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a fanmade poster from CreepyDuckDesign (https://twitter.com/creepyduckart/status/1502375358280179713). Unsure what the copyright of this poster is. Should we delete? ChipotleHater (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unofficial fan made poster. Salavat (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Maxwell (Rúhíyyih Khánum).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cunado19 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Now on Commons as File:Mary-Maxwell-1926.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.