The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep in Haitian Football Federation, remove all other instances. — ξxplicit 02:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Another leftover from non-free content review. Again, a non-free image probably used on too many pages. See original discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 71#File:Federation Haitienne de Football.png Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Three images used on the same article that likely don't comply with our non-free content criteria. This is a leftover from the defunct non-free content review and that original discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 71#File:HornetsPrg112666Rochester.jpg, File:Hornets 55.jpg and File:1939-40hornetspostcard.jpg Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
decorative non-free image used simply to show the former logo. Usage fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 07:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary: portrait of uploader, who has so far made no useful contributions to the encyclopedia. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
While it is generally held that a single non-free album cover is acceptable in an article about an album, this does not extend to second covers. There is no evidence that this particular cover is significant, and even the release itself is only mentioned in passing. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Tiny orphaned image (just thirty thousand pixels), and I don't imagine this getting used any time soon; it's so small that it really wouldn't work at Rosemount, Ohio, for example. Nyttend (talk) 14:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)