The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Converted album cover, Seemingly unsed, but can't be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
This appears to be a cropped portion of a higher resolution image already at Commons - File:Józef Haller.PNG which has a clearer licensing/attribution. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unneeded JPEG version of File:Army National Guard logo.png. —innotata 02:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
This is a textlogo, not necessarily own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
This image is currently tagged as self, but the description read "fair use rationale", with no rationale actually being provided. This (given the low resoultion) makes me wonder if the licensing is wrong. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, possibly a user profile image? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Photo was not taken by uploader. Need evidence the photographer assigned permission properly. BethNaught (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused , Possibly profile image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, appears to be feedback for something, Education project related? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, appears to tracking for some kind of project. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, appears to feedback for some project Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused, and without context maybe out of scope on Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsued, and with no context Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete per WP:FOP. The USA does not allow freedom of panorama... a sculptor owns all the images of the sculpture. In this case, the sculptor is Stephen H. Smith and the sculpture was made in 2003. For proof see http://www.dcmemorials.com/index_indiv0005381.htm, http://wrightstories.com/wright-brothers-sculpture/ and http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-12-13-wright-bros-sculpture_x.htm. Binksternet (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
This is unused, and although claimed as self, It may be promotional material from the named company. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Image is being used in Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport#History. Image is not discussed at all and usage appears primarily decorative. I don't think the image is needed per WP:NFCC#8 for the reader to understand the sentence "In 2006 Birmingham International Airport celebrated its 75th year." - Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Image is being used in Phoenix in popular culture and Georgios Papadopoulos. It has a non-free use rationale for each article but use does not seem to satisfy WP:NFCC#8 for either article. Use in "Phoenix in popular culture" also probably fails WP:NFCC#1 since there area a number of images at Commons which could be used to express the same idea. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove from all articles except Argentine Football Association. — ξxplicit 05:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Image is used in multiple articles had has a non-free rationale for each. The question is whether the logo of a national federation can be used or should be used in individual team articles. No. 17 of WP:UUI#NFC says that logos for parent entities should not be used in child entity articles, and that logo specific to the child entity should be used instead (ala WP:NFCR#File:USA Hockey.svg above). The national teams of many countries, however, do use the same logo for all age-levels of competition and both men and women's team. Most of the official pages linked to for these teams will all show the same logo being used, so I am wondering if there are any allowances to be made in such cases. I've removed some similar logos in the past per No. 17, so I would just like a little more clarification. I can re-add the logos if there use is actully considered acceptable. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2015
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
This is at commons as File:PaulGreenbergAuthorofFourFish.jpg but there seems to be a licensing mismatch. Who actually took the photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Image uploaded by blocked user. Also I am not sure it's self as claimed as this looks like an official photo found elsewhere. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Upload by blocked user. Also I'm skeptical about a self claim as this looks like an older photo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert license to ((PD-logo)). — ξxplicit 05:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Is this image eligible for copyright protection in the US? George Ho (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
This is a Logo that has been obseleted by ann SVG version. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo, which cannot be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo, which cannot be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused image, too low res to be of practical use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:NFUR, as it is virtually identical to the non-free standard cover and there is no critical commentary accompanying this variation. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)