The result of the discussion was: withdrawn as a waste of time, according to some people. --George Ho (talk) 01:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Same as below; see #File:Reg Cox.jpg. Keep, as well. George Ho (talk) 23:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn as a waste of time, according to some people. --George Ho (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Participants of WP:EE, such as Raintheone, GSorby, and AnemoneProject, oppose this image and want this image removed from Wikipedia as "pointless and unnecessary". They think this image fails WP:NFCC#8 because they believe that identifying a character with this image is trivial. To me, it doesn't. Well, I tried WP:DRV, but Fastily restored them as "non-controversial" restorations. I would say keep this image. George Ho (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext
" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=
", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=
". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded this image myself and am now looking to delete it. This band no longer consists of four members but now only consists of three, so this photo is outdated. I have uploaded an updated image of this band, which is already in use on Wikipedia. Tailtrap (talk) 01:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete Danger High voltage! 02:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Violates points three and eight of WP:NFCC. This cover is not significantly different from the main cover to justify its use. — ξxplicit 07:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pronunciation sample of a made-up, nonsense word. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. Article for which this was probably intended has been deleted since 2009. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To the best of my knowledge regarding fair-use, we can't use a copyrighted image of a painting in 8th King's Royal Irish Hussars, an article about a regiment of the British Army, we'd only be able to use it in an article about the painting I think. Even if we can use it, I dispute that the use of the image does actually "illustrate the historical significance of the 8th King's Royal Irish Hussars at the Battle of Imjin, Korea 1951" as the fair-use rationale claims. 2 lines of K303 14:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A poor quality gif map of the Schengen Area. There are already much better svg maps on commons like File:Schengen Area Labelled Map.svg and File:Schengen Area.svg. And a clickable map Template:Schengen Agreement Labelled Map 2. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 21:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The user seems to have uploaded many copyvios of Millennium Gate. I couldn't find this particular one, though. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]