< August 10	August 12 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and redundant: a higher resolution alternative is available under cc-by-2.0: File:PR2 at Maker Faire.jpg, indicating that File:Pr2-laas-cnrs.png fails WP:NFCC #1. Mephistophelian (talk) 00:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File already exists on Commons. (Note: There is a bot generated transfer tag here and I would normally go ahead and transfer it, but the exact same file already exists here) Crakkerjakk (talk) 01:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very, very low quality. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very low quality. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused without foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Source is ((bsr)) so it is impossible to verify the permission. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Low quality. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. You can barely see the guy and it doesn't help me understanding the topic better in any way. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I think this is a WP:POINTy and forum-shopping nomination. The image was originally uploaded as free because copyright had expired in Australia. The nom has listed it at WP:PUF (along with a lot of other files) and in response the uploader added an FUR to it because of the nom's claim.[1] The fact is, the image is ((PD-Australia)) so it doesn't require an FUR, because it's free. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is not free in the United States and it doesn't qualify for fair use. However, due to the addition of a fair use rationale, it is no longer deletable at WP:PUF, so it has to go here instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - If the image is no longer deletable at PUF, have you withdrawn your nomination? --AussieLegend (talk) 19:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My FUR gave the reasons why it is a useful photo that adds to the understanding of the person involved. A better quality version photo may be able to be found. If AFD isn't to be used for cleanup, why should FFD? And like I say in the rational, it is actually a free file in the country of its origin. The-Pope (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that you should read WP:NFCC#3a. You shouldn't use multiple unfree photos if one is enough, and there is already a different photo there. This photo doesn't add any information in my opinion. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - One is him as a player and the other is him as a coach. Both are threatened with deletion. Glad you think that zero is enough.The-Pope (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - The other one is only tagged as "possibly unfree". Anyway, it says that he was active from 1942 to 1956. Wouldn't there be some published photos of him which were taken before 1946? Australian photos are usually in the public domain in the United States if they were taken before 1946 and published before 1989. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't help me understanding the topic better → fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 19:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cher lloyd want u back has also a pic from the music video with the same text so i dont understand th problem!--Celomuca (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC) I now added text that shows when she was wax like and started melting, and that it was something imaginary, that perfect doesnt exist!--Celomuca (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Stefan2. There was a perfectly fine free image in the article, before this was uploaded. Also, I don't know if this is a valid reason at WP:FFD, but the image was uploaded by a sockpuppet. - JuneGloom Talk 22:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the user was blocked or banned when the file was uploaded, then WP:CSD#G5 may apply. If no identified alternative account was blocked or banned on upload, I would assume that WP:CSD#G5 doesn't apply. I am not sure if this sockpuppet information means that File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg also should be deleted (per G5). I would otherwise say that File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg is valid and acceptable fair use. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't help me understanding the topic better → fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 19:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used in Team GB but not referred to within the article. I'd argue it doesn't add anything to the article, and the present logo does the job. Cloudbound (talk) 20:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete:Chicago-Midway1A.JPG Truthanado (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#3b. A different image, File:BasedonaTRUStory.jpg, is already available. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#3b, WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#10a and WP:NFCC#10c. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

August 11

File:Pr2-laas-cnrs.png

File:Shavar-Ross-2007.jpg

File:Garfieldgoeshollywood.jpg

File:9LivesVHS.jpg

File:Teslasgrades3.png

File:Allaroundamazingaward.png

File:Alone in fantasy.jpg

File:Amalgam vol1 maya zankoul.png

File:America ww1 poster.jpg

File:An unclear image of Jodie Brook.JPG

File:Andrewparodibirthannouncement.jpg

File:Charlie Sutton Coaching.jpg

File:Putp-video.jpg

File:30MLA-video.jpg

File:2004-team-gb-logo.png

File:Midway conections.jpg

File:2 chainz based on a tru story deluxe edition.jpg

File:LloydBanksV6back.jpg

File:DJ Khaled - Kiss The Ring - Back.jpg