• Comments FYI: This is probably my first time reviewing a discography,
  • The first paragraph of the lead is too short compared to others. That should be avoided.
  • Rise Against's next album would be Endgame in 2011 - "would be" seems too colloquial to me, maybe "Endgame, Rise Against's next album, was released in 2011"
  • most successful album chart-wise to date - to what date? Will this statement be true next year?

Reworded. I removed the part that mentions 85,000 copies sold, as I had only mentioned sales for Appeal to Reason, and no other album.

• • The 2014 album - what album is that? The Black Market? Be more specific

Done. Also, I condensed the lead into two decent sized paragraphs, instead of one decent sized paragraph and two short paragraphs.

• • The lead overall listed the studio albums with a couple of singles and a compilation album. Nothing on documentaries (2) or music videos (17)

Yeah I knew this would be problematic. Most discography pages solely focus on albums and singles, as they reach music charts, while the lesser known extended plays and documentaries, barely sell. I can include the documentaries if you want, but the music videos are almost never put in the lead, even on FL pages.

• • The lead should also mention that the band's former name was Transistor Revolt. I was surprised by that B note.

Honestly, I don't think that's necessary. The band was known as Transistor Revolt for a year at most, and of all the sources I've found, a grand total of two mention their previous name, both of which are used in the list. Almost no one knows there original name. Besides, there are several famous bands that were originally under a different name. For example, Maroon 5 was originally Kara's Flowers, while Nirvana had four different names including Pen Cap Chew, Bliss, and Ted Ed Fred. Neither of those band articles or discography pages (both of which are at FL status) mention the band's original name in the lead.

Maroon 5 discography mentions the old name.Cheetah <small(talk) 19:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, whoops, I guess I just glossed over it. Anyway, I added the band's original name.

• • The tables are missing captions per MOS:DTT
  • The "notes" should be a separate section
  • Reference from Bundesverband Musikindustrie is not in English
  • Why is the reference for "I Don't Want to Be Here Anymore" formatted differently?

It's a cite web instead of a cite AV media notes. The ref I used to source The Black Market also mentioned that "I Don't Want to Be Here Anymore" was the album's first single, so I decided to reuse it

Is "*" really necessary?Cheetah (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• • What do the Media notes mean? What is the purpose of listing that under references?

Media notes are basically another way of saying liner notes for CDs. Since I couldn't find refs for most of the singles to prove they were indeed released as singles, I just decided to cite the CD single itself, which is accepted in discography pages

I've checked three Discography FL pages and none of them have such lines: Maroon 5 discography, Selena Gomez discography, and Evanescence discographyCheetah (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I've been using Azealia Banks discography as a model, but after looking through WP:DISCOGSTYLE, I don't find anything that says that singles need to be sourced. I guess I put myself through more trouble than I needed to. I will remove the single citations, but I'd like to keep the album citations, since that is in almost every discography list.

--Cheetah (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please, let me strike my comments next time. Thanks!--Cheetah (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]