Lead

• Needs citations for plot, production/acting/directing credits.

• Added. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Plot summary currently is probably too detailed and copied pretty much word for word from the movie article.

• I've trimmed some lines away. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Box office section is also probably too detailed. Just include its premiere, wide release date, opening weekend/record it broke, final gross, production budget. Box office should also be rounded to 3 significant figures as consensus has changed so something like over $385 million.

• Trimmed and abbreviated the takings. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• We've got to be passive in language so can't comment on whether it was a commercial success or not or a critical success but you can say something like Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator surveyed x reviews and judged 95% to be positive as you're just reporting it.

• I've removed that sentence. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

• add alt text to image

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Make sure that infobox matches with main table and also follows the same order

• Double checked and now done - with those new awards added too. Miyagawa (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Table

• "Awards and nominations" should be "accolades"

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Add sortability to the table as it's useful and also scope rows and scope cols for accessibility.

• Done both - haven't added sort tags to the recipients column yet. Had to remove the background colour from the headers because it was hiding the sorting buttons, but that's no biggie. Miyagawa (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Added sort tags to the recipients column now. Miyagawa (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks cleaner if you have a separate ref column

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The table doesn't seem to be any order: you can choose to make it alphabetical or by date of ceremony.

• Now double checked and sorted by alphabetical by name of award. Miyagawa (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Fill in the empty spaces with the film title itself

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Make sure every nominee is linked after you've added sortability but only red link those who've won/nominated important awards

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 22:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• also add sort by name so that nominees are sorted by last name e.g. Chris Pine, (see my edit for the code) only needed for first nominee for each award

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 22:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Usually these tables only include awards which have their own wiki page.

• There's just the one unlinked one left, and that's cited to an independent source so I think it's worthwhile keeping. Miyagawa (talk) 16:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Add casting society of america nom, denver awards, Hollywood Post Alliance, Online film and television association.

• Added. Miyagawa (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikilink Washington individual award noms also check this throughout the table as a whole load of wikis have been made for each individual award category for each awarding body.

• Added. Yet to double check other awards. Miyagawa (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

• Only italicise sources which are newspapers or magazine sources.
• Oscars.org --> Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)

• Done. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• If you link PDFs you should note which page the info is on

• Added. Miyagawa (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• There's probably no need to External link to the official website

• Removed. Miyagawa (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably more to follow... Cowlibob (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikilink "Star Trek" mentions in the nominee section of table to the film article
• IFMCA award nom should probably be Michael Giacchino for "Enterprising Young Men" so that it's sorted under Giacchino
• Zachery Quinto --> Zachary Quinto
• Star Trek does not need to be sorted to the end as you've done. You can allow it to be sorted under S
• Center refs in ref column
• Title of table section should just be "accolades"
• For the Boston Cast award and other cast awards unless it's individual members of the cast are mentioned like SAGs you don't need to add them as nominees simply the film name is ok.
• Why is there a X after Artios Awards and the date for those awards?

Sorry for the late reply here. Cowlibob (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I've sorted out those points. Miyagawa (talk) 10:58, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Add rowspan=2 for visual effects ref
• I would remove the gray lines as they seem to affect how the table displays atleast in Firefox where ref column is split up with further grey lines most notably in ref 43 where the extra line cuts across it.
• For the third paragraph start it with Star Trek garnered many awards and nominations with particular praise for x aspect of film, x2 aspect and x3 aspect. So that you highlight which aspects of the film gained the most recognition.

Cowlibob (talk) 08:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks - I've made those changes. Miyagawa (talk) 07:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]