This extensive topic covers the 400-series highways of Ontario, the major freeway network of the province, which includes the busiest freeway in the world as well as the first divided highway in North America. Aside from one article on a highway under construction (which lacks crucial data until it is opened), every article is a GA at a minimum, and many are A or FA. (note that Highway 412 is undergoing a GAN as it was only completed on Monday) -- Floydianτ¢15:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I thought the proper procedure was to wait until it's passed GA? There is no way of knowing how long it will be before it's passed for GA and all. MPJ-DK20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And a "future class"? has that been peer reviewed etc. to hit the mark for content that may not be able to get to GA/FA status yet? MPJ-DK20:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The GAN for Highway 412 is done and only awaiting promoted. However, I did miss the ball on sending Highway 418 for a peer review. Doing that in a minute. Unless a fellow WP:HWY member takes it on in the next 24 hours (I'll deal with any issues quickly), I'll put this nomination on hold and remove it from the queue. - Floydianτ¢22:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I remember seeing somewhere that FT/GT boxes shouldn't show a WikiProject A-Class rating (just FA/FL/GA/Peer reviewed) so that should be fixed. I can't quite remember where I saw it unfortunately. - [[User:Yellow Dingo|YellowDingo]](talk)05:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Floydian: seconded- FT/GT only supports project-wide processes, and A-class is wikiproject specific. See the top box at WP:FT - there's no mention of A-class. I've changed it for you. --PresN01:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and Support; that PR should have been closed a long time ago. Incidentally, I think this may be the first "AA-class" (audited article) inclusion that isn't for an unreleased piece of media (video game, movie, etc.). --PresN01:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm nominating this as a complete topic, a comprehensive account of Arsenal's final season in the Football League, supplemented by a cup shock and Charity Shield clash with local rivals, Tottenham. --Lemonade51 (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – As the reviewer of the Wrexham vs. Arsenal game, I have read all articles and am satisfied that the topic is extensively covered and complete. MWright96 (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question: From what I can tell, Red Dead Revolver is the only Red Dead article not included in this topic. Is there a reason the topic can't be expanded to include Revolver as well?--IDVtalk12:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IDV, there's no continuity between Revolver and Redemption as a "Red Dead" series/franchise besides the name and genre, so there accordingly isn't enough coverage to warrant a separate series-level article. But the three in this topic are indeed subarticles of Redemption. (If Revolver and Redemption had a parent topic, it would be Rockstar games and not a Red Dead series/franchise.) czar17:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Despite some confusions I felt like all the video game publications being written in the italics for the expansion, I think it could become a Good Topic. Also, I'm totally not inviting people to my peer review. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The season article has recently been granted GA status, all the race reports have achieved the same over the course of last year. The articles clearly have a common theme and are linked together with both a template (races) and in the infobox of the races (link to season article). --Zwerg Nase (talk) 23:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic work by Zwerg Nase to bring this topic up to the standard it has achieved. MWright96 (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- great undertaking, I don't think you can ask for more than the season overview plus every race being covered by a GA-level article; well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - every article is very informative and I'm pleased to see that as an F1 fan! I'm glad the main season article has passed as it neatly wraps together the whole topic now. Spiderone10:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this groups of articles for Good Topic status as I believe they hit all the marks necessary. There are nine articles in total. All are Good Articles. It covers all possible Espanto Articles that can currently be created so no gaps. They are clearly covering a similar topic and inter-connected. There is a lead article. The only challenge is that I don't have a free use image of any of Espantos. This is my first ever "Good Article" nomination and the first Lucha libre potential Good Topic as well. Any and all comments and suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. MPJ-DK20:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is possible yes, the design is not complicated. Unfortunately that is beyond my skillset to create and still look good. MPJ-DK16:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This topic covers the seven members of the Russell family, a fictional family that appeared on the American television soap operaPassions, which aired on NBC (1999–2007) and later on DirecTV (2007–08). I have been working on this a lot since the beginning of January and all eight articles have recently been passed as GAs. I would love to have this be a good topic because it would be the first one for a soap opera (as far as I am aware) and would bring more attention to this particular show. Any comments would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 03:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Driveby comment: I have removed the image that was in use on this page. Non-free images should not be used outside of the mainspace. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A political theorist and his two books. I know that he has plans for another book, but I can't see it appearing for a while yet, and, even when it does (due to the "speed" of academic publishing) it won't have sufficient coverage to be considered notable for a while longer. --Josh Milburn (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comment -- Tks for this series of articles, Josh. Just procedurally, I think we're supposed to put a link to the nomination on the article talk pages -- seem to recall it being in the instructions anyway... Content-wise, did you consider whether Centre for Animals and Social Justice should be part of the topic given Cochrane's a founder member? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Excellent work getting such an engaging photo of the subject! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk)!
Not saying it should. I mean if the topic is the guy and his works (i.e. his notable literary output) then CASJ isn't necessary and the topic is comprehensive. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I had a think on this; a number of people are affiliated with the centre, and other founding members include Dan Lyons and Robert Garner. The centre could probably be a topic in its own right, but if the article was going to go into a particular person's topic, it would be Lyons's. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is that necessary? The article on Cochrane is on the animal rights template, while one of the books is on another navbox; I'm not sure creating a new navbox with three articles (and three articles which all link to each other quite heavily) would be that beneficial. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]