The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. As this and the other categories nominated below each have 3–4 parent categories and 3–5 members, they appear to be valid for navigation, with no policy ground against keeping them. – Fayenatic London 11:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:2014 Portugal Open (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: The Main category is "Portugal Open". For every annual event, no other similar categories were created. Ninney (talk) 22:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• provisional keep I have repopulated these categories to reverse out-of-process removals, and given four children, a category would be appropriate. However, a merge of all four children into the parent is perhaps a reasonable resolution. Mangoe (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @Mangoe: Surely a better grouping method here would be of the kind Category:Men's doubles at the Portugal Open rather than the yearly one? See for example Category:IAAF World Cross Country Championships, which I recently created. SFB 22:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• In principle, Rename to include "Tennis", as golf also has "open" competitions: I had to look hard to find what sport this was. However, Comment -- the question of whether we need an annual category is questionable as Category:Portugal Open (which should be Category:Portugal Tennis Open or Category:Portugal Open (tennis) is not so heavily populated as to need splitting. Alternatively that could be split by event - men's/women's singles/doubles. This makes for four subscats. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This comment also applies to about 4 siumilar noms below. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support rename and alternative split per Peterkingiron. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• oppose alternate split Looking at the other WTA categories, where they exist they are inevitably split by event, then year, with an overall categorization of "WTA by year". I don't see the overall men's/women's splitting that would justify doing it in this case. The members of this would therefore go into Category:Portugal Open and Category:2014 WTA Tour if anything, but as I said earlier, I think four members is arguably enough to justify the "event by year" subcat. Mangoe (talk) 12:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus as above. – Fayenatic London 11:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:2013 Portugal Open (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: The Main category is "Portugal Open". For every annual event, no other similar categories were created. Ninney (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, if the category is useful multiple categories based on it could be created.

Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 21:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• provisional keep I have repopulated these categories to reverse out-of-process removals, and given four children, a category would be appropriate. However, a merge of all four children into the parent is perhaps a reasonable resolution. Mangoe (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus as above. – Fayenatic London 11:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:2006 Estoril Open (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: The Main category is "Portugal Open". For every annual event, no other similar categories were created. Ninney (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus as above. – Fayenatic London 11:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:2005 Estoril Open (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: The Main category is "Portugal Open". Ninney (talk) 21:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus as above. – Fayenatic London 11:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:1989 Estoril Open (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: The Main category is "Portugal Open" Ninney (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 12:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Rakowicki Cemetery to Category:Cemeteries in Kraków

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge, contains only 1 article and 1 sub-cat. The Polish Wikipedia and Commons have more content at this level, but at present there is no need for this level in English Wikipedia. – Fayenatic London 09:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, on the basis of custom and practise in this category tree. The sub-category in Category:Rakowicki Cemetery is already in the correct 'burials' categories. Sionk (talk) 18:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support with no objection to recreating if an editor who reads Polish wants to translate the content from the sister Wikipedia site. RevelationDirect (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- There is no scope for expansion and the article on the cemetery will make an appropriate main article for the burials in sub-cat. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.