< March 1 March 3 >

March 2

[edit]

Category:EOKA struggle

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy close Nominator agreed to close CFD so that category can be speedied. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:EOKA struggle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty category, redundant since the relevant Category:EOKA also exists Constantine ✍ 23:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Recipients of the Victoria Cross by nationality

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Recipients of the Victoria Cross by nation to Category:Recipients of the Victoria Cross by nationality
Nominator's rationale: Rename, chnaging "by nation" to "by nationality" per other categories of "Fooers by nationality". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Albion Rovers F.C. (Scotland)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename:
--Xdamrtalk 17:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Albion Rovers F.C. (Scotland) to Category:Albion Rovers F.C.
Nominator's rationale: Rename all to match main article; this was previously moved from Albion Rovers F.C. (Scotland) to Albion Rovers F.C. as it was considered the primary topic over the similarly named team from Wales. As there are no categories relating to the Welsh outfit the categories should follow suit as disambiguation is unnecessary.Jellyman (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Star Trek music

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Star Trek music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Category was deleted a couple of years ago. Speedy declined because there were more articles placed in it but after removing articles for songs inextricably linked to Star Trek like Row, Row, Row Your Boat the category remains small with little or no growth potential and serves as a magnet for adding any song used in a Star Trek movie however peripherally. Otto4711 (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Martial artists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename all. The sub-categories of Category:Martial arts practitioners by nationality all use the format "Fooian martial artists", and all but two of the first-level sub-categories of Category:Martial arts practitioners use "martial artists" rather than "practitioners". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Economic, Social and Cultural Council

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at today's CfD page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Economic, Social and Cultural Council to Category:ECOSOCC
Nominator's rationale: WP:COMMONNAME and this discussion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The article is at Economic, Social, and Cultural Council, so I'd actually propose adding an extra comma to the category name, rather than going for an acronym on the parent category. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HIV/AIDS

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep all. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS researchers to Category:HIV and AIDS researchers
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS research institutes to Category:HIV and AIDS research institutes
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS prevention organizations to Category:HIV and AIDS prevention organizations
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in Africa to Category:HIV and AIDS in Africa
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean to Category:HIV and AIDS in the Caribbean
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in the United Kingdom to Category:HIV and AIDS in the United Kingdom
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in the United States to Category:HIV and AIDS in the United States
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in Uganda to Category:HIV and AIDS in Uganda
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in Switzerland to Category:HIV and AIDS in Switzerland
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in South Africa to Category:HIV and AIDS in South Africa
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in India to Category:HIV and AIDS in India
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in the People's Republic of China to Category:HIV and AIDS in the People's Republic of China
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in Canada to Category:HIV and AIDS in Canada
Propose renaming Category:Documentary films about HIV/AIDS to Category:Documentaries about HIV and AIDS
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS in literature to Category:HIV and AIDS in literature
Propose renaming Category:People associated with HIV/AIDS to Category:People associated with HIV and AIDS
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS organizations to Category:HIV and AIDS organizations
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS by region to Category:HIV and AIDS by region
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS by country to Category:HIV and AIDS by country
Propose renaming Category:HIV/AIDS to Category:HIV and AIDS
Nominator's rationale: WP:SLASH. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Olympic alpine skiers of Albania

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep nomination withdrawn; see last comment. (non-admin closure) Bradjamesbrown (talk) 23:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Olympic alpine skiers of Albania to Category:Albanian alpine skiers
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping contents. McMarcoP (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Comedians by century

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and merge as nominated. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deleting:
Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: Delete & merge, per the consensus in many recent discussions that by-century categories of people-by-occupation may be useful for the 19th century and before, but not for the 20th- and 21st-centuries. (And sorry for the 10-hour delay in completing this nomination). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Television personalities by century

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge both. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging
Nominator's rationale: Merge both. There is a general consensus against 20th and 21st-century sub-categories of people-by-occupation categories, and television is another bad topic for this form of categorisation. Per the timeline of the introduction of television in countries broadcasts only began on a significant scale in the 1940s and 1950s, yet these categories set out to divide this 70-year history into two 100-year blocs. That's a really bad way of grouping articles for navigational purposes, not least because nearly all the 21st-century television personalities are also 20th-century television people. (These two categories contain only 13 articles between them. Of the 6 articles in Category:20th-century television personalities, only one is not among the 12 in Category:21st-century television personalities.)
Note that these categories probably should have been included in Cfd February 26 discussion of Category:Television people by century, but since they were not sub-categories of Category:Television people by century I didn't spot them at the time. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Film directors by century

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and merge as nominated. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deleting
Propose merging
Nominator's rationale: Merge and delete. The first commercial films date only from the 1890s (see History of film#The_silent_era), so occupation of film director is only 115 years old. Dividing those 115 years into three blocks of 100 years make no sense: there were few 19th-century directors, and at this early point in the current century most 21st-century directors were also active in the 20th century.
Other recent discussions of people-by-occupation-by-century categories have shown a preference for keeping some 19th-century categories, but in this case there is currently no 19th-century category. I can't see any point in creating one, because it would amount to a small and arbitrary subset of Category:Silent film directors, a category which provides a much more logical grouping of the early days of film. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DCAU screenshots and pictures

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Category:DCAU screenshots and pictures to Category:DC animated universe screenshots and pictures. --Xdamrtalk 17:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:DCAU screenshots and pictures to Category:DC animated universe images
Nominator's rationale: Per main category and simpler name —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:ANTARA people

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Category:ANTARA people to Category:Antara news agency people. --Xdamrtalk 17:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:ANTARA people to Category:???
Nominator's rationale: This should certainly be renamed if kept (per main article and WP:ALLCAPS), but the current name implies a people group. Should this be further renamed? Maybe Category:Persons associated with Antara? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this Indonesian organisation acronym was commonly found in caps SatuSuro 06:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:ANAPROF

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename per nominator. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:ANAPROF to Category:Liga Panameña de Fútbol
Nominator's rationale: Per main. There should be some consistency to the articles within this as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - nominators personal rationale does not coincide with the usage again - just because an acronym exists is not necessarily a reason to create the expanded words - 10 of the articles in the category have the acronym as the title - common usage is a good argument against making it the title - just one in the category with the suggested name. SatuSuro 07:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Myanmar

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename:
--Xdamrtalk 17:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Ambassadors of Russia to Myanmar to Category:Ambassadors of Russia to Burma
Propose renaming Category:Ambassadors of Myanmar to Russia to Category:Ambassadors of Burma to Russia
Propose renaming Category:Ambassadors of Myanmar to Category:Ambassadors of Burma
Propose renaming Category:Government ministries of Myanmar to Category:Government ministries of Burma
Nominator's rationale: Per main article (Burma) and category (Category:Burma). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deprecated citation templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. --Xdamrtalk 17:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Deprecated citation templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty. I am nominating this rather than using a db-tag because there may be something I'm missing here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose the templates that were here were deleted at Tfd. Delete only if this is so, but repopulate if not. Debresser (talk) 06:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Whiptail lizards

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Whiptail lizards to Category:Teiidae
Nominator's rationale: Merge, duplicate category for a lizard family. The parent article is at Teiidae, which shows that "whiptail lizard" is not a comprehensive common term for all included species. postdlf (talk) 04:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:BGN/PCGN romanization

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:BGN/PCGN romanization to Category:BGN–PCGN romanization
Nominator's rationale: WP:SLASH and title of main article (which I just moved.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the European Greens - European Free Alliance

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Category:Members of the European Greens - European Free Alliance to Category:European Greens–European Free Alliance. --Xdamrtalk 17:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Members of the European Greens - European Free Alliance to Category:European Greens–European Free Alliance
Nominator's rationale: These parties are members of either the European Free Alliance or the European Green Party. However they are not themselves members of a parliamentary group such as the "European Greens - European Free Alliance", only their MPs are. So this category is both wrong and unnecessary. It can safely be merged into its parent category Category:European Greens–European Free Alliance which is enough to indicate their affiliation to a parliamentary group. PanchoS (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ehm, yes, certainly the two alliances are different from each other, which is why they have separate categories.
    But this is not about merging the respective categories of European Greens and of EFA. This is about merging the category Category:Members of the European Greens - European Free Alliance (which is both unnesessary and wrong) to its parent category Category:European Greens–European Free Alliance.
    I can't see that your otherwise reasonable objections to blurring the distinction between the two alliances, were warranted. The contrary is the case: as I said, parties are only members of either the Greens or the EFA, not of the common parliamentary group. So the distinction between the two alliances rather gets clearer. PanchoS (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Northern Irish Radio DJs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus for this merge, ut the proposal below applies to this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Northern Irish Radio DJs to Category:Radio personalities from Northern Ireland
Nominator's rationale: Merge. No distinction between the two categories and no need to have both available. "Radio personalities" category covers a more comprehensive range of articles. Fattonyni (talk) 02:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Northern Irish xxx to xxx of Northern Ireland

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Mass renaming proposal in line with conventions used in main article title (Culture of Northern Ireland and various archived Cfd discussions including Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 18#Category:Northern Irish television and Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 September 9#Northern Irish. Fattonyni (talk) 02:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British film director templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:British film director templates to Category:European film director templates
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Mostly-overlapping with Category:English film director templates and make up an unnecessary sublevel in Category:European film director templates. Most of the entries are actually for English directors but have been misplaced because of the overlap. Categories for other British countries can be created if the number of templates is sufficient, otherwise they can be placed directly under the European category. An alternative could be to delete the English subcat and move everything to the British one, but a merge between Britain and Europe would be preferable as I see it. Smetanahue (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Templates deprecated from November 2006

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as empty/emptied monthly maintenance category. Debresser (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Templates deprecated from November 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Children

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. --Xdamrtalk 17:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Children to Category:People who became notable as children
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The bulk of sub-categories here involve people who became notable as children rather than current children. PatGallacher (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there are just a handful of subcats where the issues are slightly different, if this cat is renamed we will have to consider what to do with them. PatGallacher (talk) 11:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that misunderstands the issue. Effectively, this category already does mostly consist of people who were notable as children but are now adults. The name should be changed to reflect this. PatGallacher (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point. I'm changing my !vote to other rename to Category:People notable as children. It accomplishes your goal, but is less wordy. Maurreen (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ridiculous category. At one point every single person on Wiki was a child, so in theory everybody could go in this category. Djln--Djln (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Football competitions in the Republic of Ireland

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest renaming or deleting the following categories
Nominator's rationale: Current categories are populated by articles about association football or soccer, so it should be renamed to disambiguate from other football codes in Ireland. The category could not even be accurately populated with other articles about other football codes in Ireland as they are organised on an All-Ireland basis. Djln--Djln (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

League of Ireland Shield

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest deleting the following category
Nominator's rationale: Pointless having a category about this defunct competition. Very unlikely to be populated by anything other then article of same name. Djln --Djln (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More