The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 00:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Specialties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability substantiated by multiple reliable third-party sources. --EEMIV (talk) 23:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• delete there is a claim of notability, but there are no reliable sources to verify the claim. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 00:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No third-party sources to support notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources make it notable CynofGavuf 07:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.