The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wyldsson Elite Nutrition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP- non-notable company Joseph2302 (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete no evidence of significant in depth coverage to meet WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Almost A g11. The media attention is promotional nonsense. DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORP lacks indepth coverage and clearly promotional.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.