The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WIN-911 Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References seem to only be press releases and sources curated by the subject. A preliminary WP:BEFORE showed only passing mentions. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. J947 ^{(c · m)} 00:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. J947 ^{(c · m)} 00:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This shouldn't have even pass AFC, completely non notable. More than half of the references are from one PDF document which is primary source, thus fails WP:CORPDEPTH, the remaining are company website and sources which their reliability is questionable, further failing WP:RS, which is necessary for encyclopedic contents –Ammarpad (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.