The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UNIT Post Production

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable company. Very spamish and promotional. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is an older version that had loads of references, but it looks like a lot of that was removed, possibly by someone from the company, following some changes [1]. Stephen! ^Coming... 21:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's just an advertisement. Mcewan (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.