The result was delete, promotional. Jayjg (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article itself has no references or third-party coverage, and after checking the link to the one external site, this appears to be blatant advertising. What's more, the author has created a number of redirects to this page (well, I changed them to redirects; they were created wrong), and this leads me to believe even more that this is an attempt at advertising. I am not a subject matter expert here, so I asked for help at the Finance project, but based on the lack of sources, one link to an advert site, and multiple pages created, I find this to be blatant advertising and am nominating under this premise. — Timneu22 · talk 18:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]