The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, promotional. Jayjg (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transactional funding

[edit]
Transactional funding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article itself has no references or third-party coverage, and after checking the link to the one external site, this appears to be blatant advertising. What's more, the author has created a number of redirects to this page (well, I changed them to redirects; they were created wrong), and this leads me to believe even more that this is an attempt at advertising. I am not a subject matter expert here, so I asked for help at the Finance project, but based on the lack of sources, one link to an advert site, and multiple pages created, I find this to be blatant advertising and am nominating under this premise. — Timneu22 · talk 18:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.