The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted A7 by Jimfbleak (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): unsourced biography of a living person). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Barber (Cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, doesn't pass the cricket sports guidelines. Buggie111 (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I see nothing notable within this article. Although I found some coverage of him, I do not believe it is sufficient to keep this article. Eire102 (talk) 02:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.