The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toad (color)

[edit]
Toad (color) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod: A good faith search for references found no references supporting "Toad" as a recognized color name, nor could a recognized name be found for either color coordinate offered, the link given as a reference www.davidlittle5.tripod.com/frogstoads Toad is is dead and even if it was not a dead link would not be a WP:RS. There would seem to be a connection between the editor User:David Little and the reference offered at www.davidlittle5.tripod.com, which leads me to question if this article is original research. David would seem to be a relatively infrequent contributor who also edits under User talk:68.44.104.45 After the IP received a final warning Diff for removing templates on Toad (color) without addressing the concerns, User:David Little began making similar edits Diff Jeepday (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ROMALOL! This underscores why the article should be deleted Majoreditor (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.