The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tessa Mayes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a journalist, not properly referenced as passing our notability standards for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their work exists -- you don't make a journalist notable enough for a Wikipedia article by referencing it to sources where she's the bylined author of coverage of other things, you make a journalist notable enough for a Wikipedia article by referencing it to sources where she's the subject of content written by other people.
But the sources here are the former, not the latter, and the article says nothing about her that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to show the latter. Bearcat (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:17, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I did my best to improve this article, but basically found nothing that infers notability. CT55555 (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find decent secondary sources that confirm she was notable. I was looking at it just now, she has written a lot in a lot of venues, but very little of its been reviewed. The references are primary or passing mentions. scope_creep^Talk 15:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.