The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (CSD G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihanna's sixth album Technically incubated rather than deleted, but the AfD decided this should not exist as an article.) JamesBWatson (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk That Talk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created the article about two weeks ago, and it was nominated for Afd. Consensus was that the article be incubated, which is currently is. (About 25 editors were involved and took place over the course of about 7-10 days). This article lacks in content, and shouldn't exist. If the one I created is being incubated, then this one should be without doubt deleted. Plus, it isn't good faith to undermine the valued opinion of those 25 editors involved with the AfD and effectively would waste all of our time spent on the AfD. If this article is favoured over the better version currently in the incubator, then that shows a lack of morals and standards over what should be done. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihanna's sixth album to see the full extent of the AfD discussion, which resulted in Incubate. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 18:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.