The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Captive orcas. MBisanz ^talk 13:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taima (whale) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

lacks notability, reliable 3rd party sources. Appears to include original research. Rtphokie (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete This one lacks notability unlike that other article involving a whale you nominated for deletion. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree. Redirect to section in Captive orcas. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.