The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swinesend School

[edit]

Contested speedy. OR spam for an unpublished book based on NN web content. No independent sources cited. -- IslaySolomon | talk 20:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The creator has left a comment on the talk page. -- IslaySolomon | talk 20:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google shows 10 hits, five of which are directly affiliated with the web site. Page offers no evidence of notability for the book, much less the school it's based on. The book is unranked on amazon. If the book becomes well-known after publication, then a page might be appropriate, but right now, it's pretty hard to see notability. -FisherQueen 21:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The book itself does not meet WP:BK. In any case, the school itself wouldn't be inline with WP:FICT even if we considered having an article about the book. Pascal.Tesson 23:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Pascal Tesson. Also seems a bit like WP:CRYSTAL. skrshawk ( Talk | Contribs ) 04:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Apologies. Agree that article should be deleted. Was unaware that yet-to-be published books do not meet criteria. Not sure how to delete article, so would be grateful if someone could do it on my behalf. These two articles also need to be deleted Ben Locker and William dornan GAHenty 12:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.