The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --PeaceNT (talk) 03:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skyline Builders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I hearby nomiate Skyline Builders atleast due to the following reasons

WP:SOAP WP:NOT WP:SPAM

Tinucherian (talk · contribs) 10:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep- bad faith nomination by User:Tinucherian. details are here --Avinesh Jose  T  10:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I see no advertising, or attempt at soapboxing here. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 11:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Though it is unreferenced, but the tone doesn't seem to be an advertising one. Wikipedians from India, specially from South India may improve this article with some proper citations. -- Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 12:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - notable. Although a bit spammy, nothing that can't be taken care of. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.