The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 06:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shin-Ninjutsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Made up word with no real meaning. The article appears to be designed to advertise a non-notable single school. This was initially a PROD but the initial authors placed a comment on the Talk page. Because of that the PROD was removed. Peter Rehse 02:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Since it is about "new ninjutsu styles" that aren't verified, and "that have no direct relation with the established traditional Ninjutsu schools," there are inherent notability issues. ◄Zahakiel► 04:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, little more than an ad. -- feb^talk 06:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Sorry, but Wikipedia is not for neologisms, or for things thought up in martial arts class one day. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 11:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Just like everyone above has said, this article just doesn't belong here. --Kimon 21:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per what people have, had, and will say. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 04:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. They didn't even translate "Shin-ninjitsu" properly. --UsaSatsui 16:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ugh. JuJube 10:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.