The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 06:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Apparently unverifiable. Various Google searches for the topics in the article find only this Wikipedia article and its mirrors. The only contributions of User:Wilson phd, the editor who created it, are this article and links to it in other pages. The Anome 10:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - maybe a hoax, maybe not, doesn't really matter. Completely non-notable either way. Not only unverified but also unverifiable. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 11:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, whether it is a hoax or unpublished original research. --Tikiwont 12:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR, WP:V, WP:N and possibly WP:HOAX. I find it troubling to see an article about a 'theory proposed by a scientist' that doesn't even cite the article or articles that scientist proposed the theory in. Scientific theories aren't something they mused about to a friend over lunch, they are formalized with publication. Except this one, which seems to have no evidence or assertion of it's existence. -Markeer 13:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article is hoax I guess. Daniel5127 | Talk 02:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.