The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RightAnswers, Inc.

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/RightAnswers, Inc.

Advertising. The only assertion of notability is that the company is "the largest provider of technical support content for internal IT departments" however I can't find anything that bears this out. pablo_hablo. 23:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this AfD was incomplete. It has been fixed. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Corporate advertisement. §FreeRangeFrog 05:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think they meet WP:CORP. I've added some sources, some of which are not reliable for establishing notability, but provide backup information (press releases). — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 09:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fits the profile: yet another online consulting business with an article written in vague, evasive, and promotional buzzword language: RightAnswers also provides help desk and knowledge management solutions to capture, organize, and enhance an organization's knowledge. The added sources would appear mostly to be copies of press releases touting deals made or the business's growth: not really independent or non-company-generated sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Advertisement. ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 16:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A well-sourced ad is still an ad. No information to show that it passes the notability guidelines. Themfromspace (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.