The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regen Power

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable business. TThis article is bombarded with sources but none good for gng. Primary, listings, PR. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Admittedly checking the existing citations was bordering on entertaining, notwithstanding that none of them satisfy WP:IRS. A search via ProQuest found 1 (yes only 1) article and it was not 'significant'. I also note the creator of the page appears to have a SPA. Promotional.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabrils (talk • contribs)
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.