The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Razzle Bam Boom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entertainment organisation, no independent references. Taking straight to afd as the article has been around for a while. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nominator, not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I couldn't find adequate sources. Stowonthewolder (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable, as above Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom rationale. Bruddersohn (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable organization. Mostly, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as no secondary or third-party sources discussing the organization exist. — ṞṈ™

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.