The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Since all delete !votes are based on the missing sources to establish notability, there is no prejudice against recreation if notability can be demonstrated using reliable, third-party sources. Regards SoWhy 13:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Burden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) by not containing references from third-party, secondary sources (all BBC refs are firmly connected to the subject). The JPStalk to me 00:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Although primary sources can provide references, notability is established through independent sources. As there are no independent sources, the article fails this basic notability threshold. The JPStalk to me 19:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.