The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puss in Boots: The Story of an Ogre Killer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Rampant crystal-ballery, a movie that may or may not be released and isn't scheduled to come out for another 5 years. Stifle (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's not "may or may not" at this point. Confirmed here: "We will have the ['Puss in Boots' spinoff] movie � it is interesting to do a movie only with the character � called 'Puss in Boots: The Story of an Ogre Killer.' It would be between the third and the fourth 'Shrek.'" Crystal-ballism only qualifies on things without attention. --badlydrawnjeff talk 21:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. --Dhartung | Talk 06:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Definitely keep per badlydrawnjeff. It would also be notable, since the character already became popular with Shrek 2. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 07:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as crystal-ballism. When the only information we have is: A movie of this title will be made years from now (bearing in mind how often movie plans change) it's not worth an article. We cannot provide encyclopedic, verifiable information about this movie at this time. Fan-1967 07:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Even EmpTV's (incredibly ugly and clunky) website really doesn't "confirm" anything except what few lines Banderas himself says, no references to studio press releases or other sources on this. A line or two in other articles saying that such a thing is hoped or planned for in the future is enough, not enough to go on to make a whole article at this point. Tubezone 08:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Terence Ong 09:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.