The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
When I had originally nominated this, there were no sources given at all. Now sources are listed, which influences me that it is notable to keep. However, let's see what others think. Tinton5 (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : I think too it's waste of time listing this page here..bcoz it does takes time to update the company's info and its project's wiYh all the references..if need more references..it will also be addded. I ll also suggest the move to Prestige Group (developer) User talk:Sayowais06:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It is very much a popular company in India. No doubt of notability or lack of sources. I too support the move to Prestige Group (developer)--Anbu121 (talk me) 19:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.