The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to spambot. Sandstein 17:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Porn bot

[edit]

Prod removed without comment. This is a generalised term with many different meanings. For example this, this and this. There is no reliable source ascribing the very precise description in this page and even the cited link doesn't use this term. Fails WP:V. Delete. Smile a While (talk) 02:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge into spambot. Not worthy of an article in itself. Richard001 (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless article and it doesn't appear that it will get more notable. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Merge into spambot per Richard001. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to spambot 70.51.11.115 (talk) 06:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to spambot (and merge if necessary), as a "porn bot" is a form of a spambot. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 21:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - there is certainly not anything mergeable since nothing is reliably sourced. However, after a deletion I would have no problem with a redirect. Smile a While (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Spambot. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.