The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth pine

[edit]
Plymouth pine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable. The claim is for making a low tech product for the last few years. Peter Rehse 14:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.