The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlos Lagoudakis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prof. Lagoudakis contacted OTRS and asked for deletion of the article (VRTS ticket # 2016010610021425) because the page "contains inaccurate and outdated information". A Google News search shows no significant coverage; Google Books is similarly unhelpful; Google Scholar gave his own work but little else. The article was tagged for notability concerns since 2013; it cites no reliable third-party sources that cover Lagoudakis in any detail. Huon (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. One of Mishae's mass-created stubs; given that it's unexpandable from existing sources, the subject disputes it and there's minimal if any public interest in keeping it, there's no good reason not to delete it. ‑ Iridescent 18:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His h-index is 25, quite average for inclusion. Just because the subject disputes it, doesn't mean we should abide by what the subjects says. Lets ask @Randykitty: for thorough examination of the whole thing.--184.97.149.210 (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics-related deletion discussions. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete according to subject's wish. I get a GS h-index of 16 which is around borderline so no reason not to delete. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Correction: search for P G Lagoudakis does give a GS h-index of 25. Vote unchanged. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete per subject's wish. For precedent, the article is a keep to me, but not so important in the public interest as to overrule the subject's interests. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per subject's request. I am generally not supportive of subjects having a large amount of control of their articles. With that said, the level of English writing and comprehension is problematic in this series of articles, and it is reflecting poorly on the subjects. Many of these issues could be addressed by rewriting, but I think it is reasonable to delete articles in such a state upon request. (I do get the same h-index as Mishae did (25) by looking at the GS profile sourced in the article, though it is inaccurate to suggest that one article is responsible for anyone's h-index.) EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.