The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  —  Tivedshambo  _(t/c) 21:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Papercutz[edit]

Papercutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, removed by author. Article is about a non-notable band; cites no secondary sources as to why it is notable. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A grand total of two Google hits referring to this band--its official site, and its Myspace page. Next. Blueboy96 00:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum And based on the contrib history, the author is an SPA. Blueboy96 00:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "A grand total of two Google hits referring to this band" This is not true! my article references came from google search.

However there is also a graphic novel publisher called Papercutz that takes most of google initial pages results when searching for this name. Just use "papercutzed" (a verb used by the group used to name it's fans) as google search and see the results... --Mike trust (talk) 13:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.