The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as a stub per WP:OUTCOMES. Bearian 19:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outdoor activity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I see no point in this article's continued existence. It's been tagged for cleanup for five months now with no particular improvement, and while it's theoretically improvable (cultural attitudes to outdoor pursuits etc) I don't really see any particular point to it. As the IP says on the talk page, this article is unnecessary in its present form; it doesn't really say anything that isn't obvious from combining the dicdefs of "outdoors" and "activity". — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the nominator. The article is completely unsourced, has been for months, and does nothing but state the absolute obvious. Burntsauce 20:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Gut & stub Not much content here, but it's a potentially encyclopedic article. Replanting stubs is a great outdoor activity--Victor falk 03:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is now gutted.--Victor falk 03:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.