The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Can you please tell us what the issue is? The article could use some copy-editing and removing irrelevant information, but the central premise of the article seems fine. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 01:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question. How many sources use the term "Ocean Planet"? A quick glance revealed only one reliable source which used the term; if so, should we consider renaming the article or merging it with an appropriate article? Majoreditor (talk) 03:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (if not Speedy Keep as AfD without stated reason). Article is well-written, properly cited, and covers a valid topic. "Waterworld" seems to be used as often for the same concept. The article is a clear keep. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.