The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Object D0

[edit]

Tried prod, author deleted without explanation. ~~WP:HOAX, period.~~ "Object D0" returns only results related to mathematics; adding in any other unique terms (e.g. "tito" or "yugoslavia") returns nothing. With foreign language spelling, appears to no longer be a hoax, as a Google search reveals 4 results for "Objekat D-0". Still not notable. Gromlakh (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a problem because you can rename the article to "Objekat D-0 Konjic", it is located at Konjic, Bosnia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djamo (talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. We should ask the author to cite reliable sources since I can't read the language - and if the author (or anyone else) cannot provide them, then I'd be in favour of a delete per WP:V.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 17:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Probably sourceable using more common search terms like "Tito+bunker". It is rumored to be the model for a bunker that Yugoslavian engineers built for Saddam Hussein, for instance.[1] --Dhartung | Talk 21:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment Rumor, rumor and more rumor is all that this article is. Speculative content needs editing and references are sorely lacking. An interesting enough subject, I admit I find it intriguing, but without secondary sources, DeleteBeeblbrox (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your all missing the biggest possible source. I forgot his name, but he was the only bosnian member to work in that object. Bostel filmed a documentary and he was featured in it and they were allowed to film in the object. They confirmed everything said in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djamo (talk • contribs) 00:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, vague recollections about a documentary are not a reliable source. Jfire (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Granted, the whole point of secret military installations is that there's not a great deal of sources of information about them, but there are not enough sources to indicate that this particular facility is or was notable. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.